俄罗斯和英国痴呆症行动计划:比较分析

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0166

Nadezhda Koberskaya, Bogdan Kobierskij

{"title":"俄罗斯和英国痴呆症行动计划:比较分析","authors":"Nadezhda Koberskaya, Bogdan Kobierskij","doi":"10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to compare two national dementia plans and analyse the approach of each state to the issue.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nComparative analysis, legal analysis, policy analysis\n\n\nFindings\nAlthough research is central to both plans, the practical implementation of the Russian and UK plans differs. The Russian action plan on dementia is advisory in nature and does not propose specific programmes for research funding. Two plans have different approach to the role of education and risk factors.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLack of information on Russian regional strategies does not allow to compare regional differences between two countries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study illustrates several weak points in the UK and Russian dementia policies, which should be addressed to tackle the dementia problem in both countries.\n","PeriodicalId":14129,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russian and UK Dementia Action Plans: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nadezhda Koberskaya, Bogdan Kobierskij\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to compare two national dementia plans and analyse the approach of each state to the issue.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nComparative analysis, legal analysis, policy analysis\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAlthough research is central to both plans, the practical implementation of the Russian and UK plans differs. The Russian action plan on dementia is advisory in nature and does not propose specific programmes for research funding. Two plans have different approach to the role of education and risk factors.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLack of information on Russian regional strategies does not allow to compare regional differences between two countries.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study illustrates several weak points in the UK and Russian dementia policies, which should be addressed to tackle the dementia problem in both countries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":14129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在比较两个国家的痴呆症计划，并分析每个州解决这一问题的方法。设计/方法/方法比较分析、法律分析、政策分析发现尽管研究是两个计划的核心，但俄罗斯和英国计划的实际实施情况不同。俄罗斯关于痴呆症的行动计划是咨询性质的，没有提出具体的研究资助方案。两个计划对教育的作用和风险因素采取了不同的方法。研究局限性/含义缺乏关于俄罗斯区域战略的信息，无法比较两国之间的区域差异。独创性/价值这项研究说明了英国和俄罗斯痴呆症政策的几个弱点，应该解决这两个国家的痴呆症问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Russian and UK Dementia Action Plans: a comparative analysis

Purpose This study aims to compare two national dementia plans and analyse the approach of each state to the issue. Design/methodology/approach Comparative analysis, legal analysis, policy analysis Findings Although research is central to both plans, the practical implementation of the Russian and UK plans differs. The Russian action plan on dementia is advisory in nature and does not propose specific programmes for research funding. Two plans have different approach to the role of education and risk factors. Research limitations/implications Lack of information on Russian regional strategies does not allow to compare regional differences between two countries. Originality/value This study illustrates several weak points in the UK and Russian dementia policies, which should be addressed to tackle the dementia problem in both countries.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： nternational Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (IJHRH) is an international, peer reviewed journal with a unique practical approach to promoting race equality, inclusion and human rights in health and social care. The journal publishes scholarly and double blind peer-reviewed papers of the highest standard, including case studies and book reviews. IJHRH aims include: -To explore what is currently known about discrimination and disadvantage with a particular focus on health and social care -Push the barriers of the human rights discourse by identifying new avenues for healthcare practice and policy internationally -Create bridges between policymakers, practitioners and researchers -Identify and understand the social determinants of health equity and practical interventions to overcome barriers at national and international levels. The journal welcomes papers which use varied approaches, including discussion of theory, comparative studies, systematic evaluation of interventions, analysis of qualitative data and study of health and social care institutions and the political process. Papers published in IJHRH: -Clearly demonstrate the implications of the research -Provide evidence-rich information -Provoke reflection and support critical analysis of both challenges and strengths -Share examples of best practice and ‘what works’, including user perspectives IJHRH is a hugely valuable source of information for researchers, academics, students, practitioners, managers, policy-makers, commissioning bodies, social workers, psychologists, nurses, voluntary sector workers, service users and carers internationally.