立法与实践:以历史建筑为例

IF 1.1 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
S. Naldini, I. Ioannou, M. Hadjimichael, S. Musso, Federica Pompejano, Ondrej Dusek
{"title":"立法与实践:以历史建筑为例","authors":"S. Naldini, I. Ioannou, M. Hadjimichael, S. Musso, Federica Pompejano, Ondrej Dusek","doi":"10.1108/jchmsd-03-2022-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOnly recently have historic concrete buildings received attention and the need for their protection has been understood. Their listing as architectural heritage in most countries is ruled by legislations. The research carried out within the framework of the CONSECH20 JPI project on the conservation of historic concrete buildings in the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Italy and the Netherlands has allowed to study the legislations in the four aforementioned countries and how these are brought to practice. This paper aims at the evaluation of these legislations and of their function in practice.Design/methodology/approachThe legislations have been examined focussing on the protection of historic buildings and the guidelines to achieve a correct technical conservation. These were assessed in practical situations. The situations of the four countries were studied and the parameters used allowed comparisons.FindingsConcrete buildings are at risk and the guidelines should be further developed to meet actual conservation needs, including historical and aesthetical compatibility. The re-use of listed concrete buildings often means transforming and adapting these to a variety of modern needs and norms: the complexity of this assignment asks for a multidisciplinary teamwork. The bottom-up Dutch programme for quality in conservation, striving to bring ethical and technological principles to practice, could be a sound basis for developing respectful conservation strategies of heritage concrete buildings.Research limitations/implicationsThe research concerns the four countries involved in the CONSECH30 project and could be extended to include more countries.Practical implicationsMore stakeholders have to be involved in the process of conservation and transformation of heritage concrete buildings. This should be directed by the legislation.Social implicationsNo direct social implications are foreseen from the outcome of the research. However, the suggestion is made that social involvement is essential in planning concrete building transformations.Originality/valueThe study focussed on the application of theory (the legislation) to practice (thus showing the limits of the legislation), which is an innovative way of contributing to the conservation of historic concrete buildings.","PeriodicalId":45408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislation and practice: the case of historic concrete buildings\",\"authors\":\"S. Naldini, I. Ioannou, M. Hadjimichael, S. Musso, Federica Pompejano, Ondrej Dusek\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jchmsd-03-2022-0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeOnly recently have historic concrete buildings received attention and the need for their protection has been understood. Their listing as architectural heritage in most countries is ruled by legislations. The research carried out within the framework of the CONSECH20 JPI project on the conservation of historic concrete buildings in the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Italy and the Netherlands has allowed to study the legislations in the four aforementioned countries and how these are brought to practice. This paper aims at the evaluation of these legislations and of their function in practice.Design/methodology/approachThe legislations have been examined focussing on the protection of historic buildings and the guidelines to achieve a correct technical conservation. These were assessed in practical situations. The situations of the four countries were studied and the parameters used allowed comparisons.FindingsConcrete buildings are at risk and the guidelines should be further developed to meet actual conservation needs, including historical and aesthetical compatibility. The re-use of listed concrete buildings often means transforming and adapting these to a variety of modern needs and norms: the complexity of this assignment asks for a multidisciplinary teamwork. The bottom-up Dutch programme for quality in conservation, striving to bring ethical and technological principles to practice, could be a sound basis for developing respectful conservation strategies of heritage concrete buildings.Research limitations/implicationsThe research concerns the four countries involved in the CONSECH30 project and could be extended to include more countries.Practical implicationsMore stakeholders have to be involved in the process of conservation and transformation of heritage concrete buildings. This should be directed by the legislation.Social implicationsNo direct social implications are foreseen from the outcome of the research. However, the suggestion is made that social involvement is essential in planning concrete building transformations.Originality/valueThe study focussed on the application of theory (the legislation) to practice (thus showing the limits of the legislation), which is an innovative way of contributing to the conservation of historic concrete buildings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-03-2022-0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-03-2022-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的直到最近,历史悠久的混凝土建筑才受到关注,保护它们的必要性也得到了理解。在大多数国家,它们被列为建筑遗产是由立法规定的。在关于捷克共和国、塞浦路斯、意大利和荷兰历史混凝土建筑保护的CONCH20 JPI项目框架内进行的研究,使我们能够研究上述四个国家的立法以及如何将这些立法付诸实践。本文旨在对这些立法及其在实践中的作用进行评价。设计/方法/方法已经审查了立法,重点是保护历史建筑和实现正确技术保护的指导方针。这些都是在实际情况下进行评估的。对这四个国家的情况进行了研究,使用的参数可以进行比较。发现混凝土建筑面临风险,应进一步制定指南,以满足实际保护需求,包括历史和美学兼容性。重新使用列出的混凝土建筑通常意味着改造和适应各种现代需求和规范:这项任务的复杂性要求多学科团队合作。自下而上的荷兰保护质量计划,努力将道德和技术原则付诸实践,可以成为制定尊重遗产混凝土建筑的保护战略的坚实基础。研究局限性/影响该研究涉及CONSCH30项目涉及的四个国家,可以扩展到更多国家。实际意义更多的利益相关者必须参与遗产混凝土建筑的保护和改造过程。这应该由立法来指导。社会影响研究结果没有预见到直接的社会影响。然而,有人建议,在规划具体的建筑改造时,社会参与至关重要。原创性/价值本研究侧重于将理论(立法)应用于实践(从而显示立法的局限性),这是一种有助于保护历史混凝土建筑的创新方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legislation and practice: the case of historic concrete buildings
PurposeOnly recently have historic concrete buildings received attention and the need for their protection has been understood. Their listing as architectural heritage in most countries is ruled by legislations. The research carried out within the framework of the CONSECH20 JPI project on the conservation of historic concrete buildings in the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Italy and the Netherlands has allowed to study the legislations in the four aforementioned countries and how these are brought to practice. This paper aims at the evaluation of these legislations and of their function in practice.Design/methodology/approachThe legislations have been examined focussing on the protection of historic buildings and the guidelines to achieve a correct technical conservation. These were assessed in practical situations. The situations of the four countries were studied and the parameters used allowed comparisons.FindingsConcrete buildings are at risk and the guidelines should be further developed to meet actual conservation needs, including historical and aesthetical compatibility. The re-use of listed concrete buildings often means transforming and adapting these to a variety of modern needs and norms: the complexity of this assignment asks for a multidisciplinary teamwork. The bottom-up Dutch programme for quality in conservation, striving to bring ethical and technological principles to practice, could be a sound basis for developing respectful conservation strategies of heritage concrete buildings.Research limitations/implicationsThe research concerns the four countries involved in the CONSECH30 project and could be extended to include more countries.Practical implicationsMore stakeholders have to be involved in the process of conservation and transformation of heritage concrete buildings. This should be directed by the legislation.Social implicationsNo direct social implications are foreseen from the outcome of the research. However, the suggestion is made that social involvement is essential in planning concrete building transformations.Originality/valueThe study focussed on the application of theory (the legislation) to practice (thus showing the limits of the legislation), which is an innovative way of contributing to the conservation of historic concrete buildings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信