国际非政府组织的信誉与2018年乐施会丑闻

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
G. Clarke
{"title":"国际非政府组织的信誉与2018年乐施会丑闻","authors":"G. Clarke","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2021.1994200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2018, one of the largest international development non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the world, Oxfam GB, became engulfed in a scandal which quickly spread to other international NGOs (INGOs). The crisis arose from the sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment (SEAH) of the beneficiaries and staff of leading INGOs and caused significant reputational harm to these organizations amid declining public trust and intense political and media scrutiny. The crisis raises significant questions about the credibility of INGOs and the policies necessary to restore public trust. This article reviews the background to the crisis and the responses to it from Oxfam GB & Oxfam International, by other INGOs and by the funders and regulators tasked with overseeing them, focusing on the United Kingdom. It then analyses these actions in the context of an analytical framework proposed in Gourevitch, Lake & Stein (Eds)(2012). It argues that the Oxfam scandal of 2018 marks a fundamental shift in the manner in which INGOs must promote accountability and transparency, based on high-quality, culturally-inclusive, learning-based management.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"17 1","pages":"219 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Credibility of International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) and the Oxfam Scandal of 2018\",\"authors\":\"G. Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2021.1994200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 2018, one of the largest international development non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the world, Oxfam GB, became engulfed in a scandal which quickly spread to other international NGOs (INGOs). The crisis arose from the sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment (SEAH) of the beneficiaries and staff of leading INGOs and caused significant reputational harm to these organizations amid declining public trust and intense political and media scrutiny. The crisis raises significant questions about the credibility of INGOs and the policies necessary to restore public trust. This article reviews the background to the crisis and the responses to it from Oxfam GB & Oxfam International, by other INGOs and by the funders and regulators tasked with overseeing them, focusing on the United Kingdom. It then analyses these actions in the context of an analytical framework proposed in Gourevitch, Lake & Stein (Eds)(2012). It argues that the Oxfam scandal of 2018 marks a fundamental shift in the manner in which INGOs must promote accountability and transparency, based on high-quality, culturally-inclusive, learning-based management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2021.1994200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2021.1994200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2018年,世界上最大的国际发展非政府组织之一乐施会(Oxfam GB)卷入了一起丑闻,并迅速蔓延到其他国际非政府组织。这场危机是由主要非政府组织的受益者和工作人员的性剥削、虐待和骚扰(SEAH)引起的,在公众信任度下降和政治和媒体密切关注的情况下,对这些组织的声誉造成了重大损害。这场危机对非政府组织的可信度和恢复公众信任所必需的政策提出了重大质疑。本文回顾了这场危机的背景,以及英国乐施会和国际乐施会、其他非政府组织以及负责监督它们的资助者和监管机构对危机的反应,重点是英国。然后在Gourevitch, Lake & Stein(编辑)(2012)中提出的分析框架的背景下分析这些行动。报告认为,2018年的乐施会丑闻标志着国际非政府组织必须在高质量、文化包容和学习型管理的基础上,促进问责制和透明度的方式发生了根本性转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Credibility of International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) and the Oxfam Scandal of 2018
ABSTRACT In 2018, one of the largest international development non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the world, Oxfam GB, became engulfed in a scandal which quickly spread to other international NGOs (INGOs). The crisis arose from the sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment (SEAH) of the beneficiaries and staff of leading INGOs and caused significant reputational harm to these organizations amid declining public trust and intense political and media scrutiny. The crisis raises significant questions about the credibility of INGOs and the policies necessary to restore public trust. This article reviews the background to the crisis and the responses to it from Oxfam GB & Oxfam International, by other INGOs and by the funders and regulators tasked with overseeing them, focusing on the United Kingdom. It then analyses these actions in the context of an analytical framework proposed in Gourevitch, Lake & Stein (Eds)(2012). It argues that the Oxfam scandal of 2018 marks a fundamental shift in the manner in which INGOs must promote accountability and transparency, based on high-quality, culturally-inclusive, learning-based management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信