《太平洋财产:19世纪大洋洲旅行记录中对真实性的追求》作者:克里斯·J·托马斯(书评)

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Leanne P. Day
{"title":"《太平洋财产:19世纪大洋洲旅行记录中对真实性的追求》作者:克里斯·J·托马斯(书评)","authors":"Leanne P. Day","doi":"10.1353/cp.2022.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the southeastern Solomon Islands, where Indigenous techniques and interisland voyaging continue to be practiced. In discussing leadership and spiritual power (88–89), there is no acknowledgment of Marshall Sahlins, Irving Goldman, Firth, or the many other prominent commentators. Later, Thomas states that “Austronesian cultures seem to have privileged the ‘founders’ of particular communities” (97), without considering Sahlins’s notion of “the stranger-king” (laid out at some length in 1981). Given the intended audience, Thomas justifiably avoids excessive detail. Still, decades of debate on this important topic deserve some recognition. One factual error in the book involves Satawalese navigator Mau Piailug, who guided Hōkūle‘a without instruments from Hawai‘i to Tahiti. Thomas states that Piailug “used standard modern instruments on the return leg” (133). In fact, he did not participate in the return voyage, instead leaving directly from Tahiti for his home on Satawal (see Ben R Finney’s Hokule‘a: The Way to Tahiti [1979]). While the work would have benefitted from more comprehensive coverage and better fact-checking, Voyagers is generally well written and amply illustrated. It is accessible, contains valuable information, pays due respect to Islanders and their accomplishments, and may help inspire readers to explore the region and its people in greater depth.","PeriodicalId":51783,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Pacific","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pacific Possessions: The Pursuit of Authenticity in Nineteenth-Century Oceanian Travel Accounts by Chris J Thomas (review)\",\"authors\":\"Leanne P. Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cp.2022.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the southeastern Solomon Islands, where Indigenous techniques and interisland voyaging continue to be practiced. In discussing leadership and spiritual power (88–89), there is no acknowledgment of Marshall Sahlins, Irving Goldman, Firth, or the many other prominent commentators. Later, Thomas states that “Austronesian cultures seem to have privileged the ‘founders’ of particular communities” (97), without considering Sahlins’s notion of “the stranger-king” (laid out at some length in 1981). Given the intended audience, Thomas justifiably avoids excessive detail. Still, decades of debate on this important topic deserve some recognition. One factual error in the book involves Satawalese navigator Mau Piailug, who guided Hōkūle‘a without instruments from Hawai‘i to Tahiti. Thomas states that Piailug “used standard modern instruments on the return leg” (133). In fact, he did not participate in the return voyage, instead leaving directly from Tahiti for his home on Satawal (see Ben R Finney’s Hokule‘a: The Way to Tahiti [1979]). While the work would have benefitted from more comprehensive coverage and better fact-checking, Voyagers is generally well written and amply illustrated. It is accessible, contains valuable information, pays due respect to Islanders and their accomplishments, and may help inspire readers to explore the region and its people in greater depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Pacific\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Pacific\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2022.0051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2022.0051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所罗门群岛东南部,土著技术和岛屿间航行继续在那里进行。在讨论领导力和精神力量(88-89)时,没有提到马歇尔·萨林斯、欧文·戈德曼、费斯或许多其他杰出的评论家。后来,托马斯指出,“南岛文化似乎对特定社区的‘创始人’享有特权”(97),而没有考虑到萨林斯的“陌生人国王”概念(1981年详细阐述)。考虑到目标读者,托马斯合理地避免了过多的细节。尽管如此,几十年来关于这一重要话题的辩论值得得到一些认可。书中的一个事实错误涉及萨塔瓦勒航海家Mau Piailug,他在没有仪器的情况下将Hōkūle 'a从夏威夷引导到塔希提岛。托马斯指出,皮埃卢格“在回程时使用了标准的现代仪器”(133)。事实上,他并没有参加返航,而是直接从塔希提岛返回他在萨塔瓦尔岛的家(见Ben R Finney的《Hokule’a: the Way to Tahiti》[1979])。虽然如果能有更全面的报道和更好的事实核查,这项工作将会受益,但总的来说,《旅行者》写得很好,插图也很充分。它易于阅读,包含有价值的信息,对岛民及其成就给予应有的尊重,并可能有助于激励读者更深入地探索该地区及其人民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pacific Possessions: The Pursuit of Authenticity in Nineteenth-Century Oceanian Travel Accounts by Chris J Thomas (review)
the southeastern Solomon Islands, where Indigenous techniques and interisland voyaging continue to be practiced. In discussing leadership and spiritual power (88–89), there is no acknowledgment of Marshall Sahlins, Irving Goldman, Firth, or the many other prominent commentators. Later, Thomas states that “Austronesian cultures seem to have privileged the ‘founders’ of particular communities” (97), without considering Sahlins’s notion of “the stranger-king” (laid out at some length in 1981). Given the intended audience, Thomas justifiably avoids excessive detail. Still, decades of debate on this important topic deserve some recognition. One factual error in the book involves Satawalese navigator Mau Piailug, who guided Hōkūle‘a without instruments from Hawai‘i to Tahiti. Thomas states that Piailug “used standard modern instruments on the return leg” (133). In fact, he did not participate in the return voyage, instead leaving directly from Tahiti for his home on Satawal (see Ben R Finney’s Hokule‘a: The Way to Tahiti [1979]). While the work would have benefitted from more comprehensive coverage and better fact-checking, Voyagers is generally well written and amply illustrated. It is accessible, contains valuable information, pays due respect to Islanders and their accomplishments, and may help inspire readers to explore the region and its people in greater depth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Pacific
Contemporary Pacific AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: With editorial offices at the Center for Pacific Islands Studies, The Contemporary Pacific covers a wide range of disciplines with the aim of providing comprehensive coverage of contemporary developments in the entire Pacific Islands region, including Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia. It features refereed, readable articles that examine social, economic, political, ecological, and cultural topics, along with political reviews, book and media reviews, resource reviews, and a dialogue section with interviews and short essays. Each issue highlights the work of a Pacific Islander artist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信