意识形态与实用主义十字路口的南美一体化

Miriam Gomes Saraiva, Lorena Granja Hernández
{"title":"意识形态与实用主义十字路口的南美一体化","authors":"Miriam Gomes Saraiva, Lorena Granja Hernández","doi":"10.26851/RUCP.28.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl trabajo plantea el abordaje conceptual de la gobernanza regional para reflexionar sobre la encrucijada en que se encuentra la integracion sudamericana. Ese concepto es articulado, en un continuo en el que los diferentes actores interactuan-cooperan-coordinan-integran, con dos dimensiones transversales: la regionalidad y la ideologia. La primera parte del texto considera los terminos utilizados en los debates conceptuales sobre regionalismo, integracion, regionalizacion, regionalidad y gobernanza. La segunda, se adentra en el analisis de los patrones de convergencia o divergencia ideologica que se han sucedido entre los gobiernos de la region; plantea que las practicas y procesos instaurados para la gobernanza regional se articulan entre la ideologia y el pragmatismo. En las reflexiones finales se adelanta la futura agenda de investigacion EnglishThe paper proposes a conceptual approach based on regional governance to think about the crossroads in which the South American integration process is now. This concept is articulated in a continuum in which the different actors interact-cooperate-coordinate-integrate and has also two transversal dimensions: the regionness and the ideology. The first section analyzes the conceptual debates about regionalism, integration, regionalization, regionness and governance. The second one, identifies the patterns of ideological convergence or divergence that have been taken place between the governments at the region; the claim is that the practices and processes established to the regional governance are articulated between ideology and pragmatism. In the final reflections, the future research agenda is advanced","PeriodicalId":30990,"journal":{"name":"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integración Sudamericana en la encrucijada entre la ideología y el pragmatismo\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Gomes Saraiva, Lorena Granja Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.26851/RUCP.28.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEl trabajo plantea el abordaje conceptual de la gobernanza regional para reflexionar sobre la encrucijada en que se encuentra la integracion sudamericana. Ese concepto es articulado, en un continuo en el que los diferentes actores interactuan-cooperan-coordinan-integran, con dos dimensiones transversales: la regionalidad y la ideologia. La primera parte del texto considera los terminos utilizados en los debates conceptuales sobre regionalismo, integracion, regionalizacion, regionalidad y gobernanza. La segunda, se adentra en el analisis de los patrones de convergencia o divergencia ideologica que se han sucedido entre los gobiernos de la region; plantea que las practicas y procesos instaurados para la gobernanza regional se articulan entre la ideologia y el pragmatismo. En las reflexiones finales se adelanta la futura agenda de investigacion EnglishThe paper proposes a conceptual approach based on regional governance to think about the crossroads in which the South American integration process is now. This concept is articulated in a continuum in which the different actors interact-cooperate-coordinate-integrate and has also two transversal dimensions: the regionness and the ideology. The first section analyzes the conceptual debates about regionalism, integration, regionalization, regionness and governance. The second one, identifies the patterns of ideological convergence or divergence that have been taken place between the governments at the region; the claim is that the practices and processes established to the regional governance are articulated between ideology and pragmatism. In the final reflections, the future research agenda is advanced\",\"PeriodicalId\":30990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.28.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.28.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

西班牙的工作提出了区域治理的概念方法,以反思南美一体化的十字路口。这一概念是在一个不同行为者相互作用-合作-协调-整合的连续体中阐明的,具有两个横向层面:区域性和意识形态。案文第一部分考虑了关于区域主义、一体化、区域化、区域性和治理的概念辩论中使用的术语。第二,深入分析了该地区各国政府之间在意识形态上的趋同或分歧模式;他提出,为区域治理建立的做法和进程是在意识形态和实用主义之间建立的。在最后的反思中,提出了英国未来的研究议程。该文件提出了一种基于区域治理的概念性方法,以思考南美一体化进程现在所处的十字路口。这一概念是在不同行为者互动-合作-协调-一体化的连续体中阐明的,并有两个横向层面:区域性和意识形态。第一节分析了关于区域主义、一体化、区域化、区域性和治理的概念辩论。第二,确定该地区各国政府之间在意识形态上的趋同或分歧模式;声称为区域治理建立的做法和进程是在意识形态和实用主义之间阐明的。在最后的反思中,未来的研究议程正在推进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integración Sudamericana en la encrucijada entre la ideología y el pragmatismo
espanolEl trabajo plantea el abordaje conceptual de la gobernanza regional para reflexionar sobre la encrucijada en que se encuentra la integracion sudamericana. Ese concepto es articulado, en un continuo en el que los diferentes actores interactuan-cooperan-coordinan-integran, con dos dimensiones transversales: la regionalidad y la ideologia. La primera parte del texto considera los terminos utilizados en los debates conceptuales sobre regionalismo, integracion, regionalizacion, regionalidad y gobernanza. La segunda, se adentra en el analisis de los patrones de convergencia o divergencia ideologica que se han sucedido entre los gobiernos de la region; plantea que las practicas y procesos instaurados para la gobernanza regional se articulan entre la ideologia y el pragmatismo. En las reflexiones finales se adelanta la futura agenda de investigacion EnglishThe paper proposes a conceptual approach based on regional governance to think about the crossroads in which the South American integration process is now. This concept is articulated in a continuum in which the different actors interact-cooperate-coordinate-integrate and has also two transversal dimensions: the regionness and the ideology. The first section analyzes the conceptual debates about regionalism, integration, regionalization, regionness and governance. The second one, identifies the patterns of ideological convergence or divergence that have been taken place between the governments at the region; the claim is that the practices and processes established to the regional governance are articulated between ideology and pragmatism. In the final reflections, the future research agenda is advanced
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信