中观互动中的示范问题与认知权威管理

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2020-09-04 DOI:10.1075/ld.00067.bon

Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, A. Fermani

{"title":"中观互动中的示范问题与认知权威管理","authors":"Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, A. Fermani","doi":"10.1075/ld.00067.bon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although paranormal experiences have been broadly investigated, medium-sitter interactions have been studied much less. In this article, five excerpts from an Italian “public mediumship demonstration” are presented with the main aim to answer the following research questions: (1) what are the linguistic strategies used by the medium to manage her epistemic authority and by the sitters to acknowledge, strengthen, resist or contest it? (2) how do these strategies affect the sequential structure of interaction? The analyses reveal that: the medium mainly uses demonstrative questions; sitters generally confirm what the medium discloses, acknowledging her epistemic authority; when sitters do not confirm, the medium resorts to three main linguistic strategies attempting to (re)establish her authority; when the medium has to manage confirmation failures, the sequential structure becomes more complex.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":"10 1","pages":"215-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstrative questions and epistemic authority management in medium-sitter interactions\",\"authors\":\"Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, A. Fermani\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00067.bon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although paranormal experiences have been broadly investigated, medium-sitter interactions have been studied much less. In this article, five excerpts from an Italian “public mediumship demonstration” are presented with the main aim to answer the following research questions: (1) what are the linguistic strategies used by the medium to manage her epistemic authority and by the sitters to acknowledge, strengthen, resist or contest it? (2) how do these strategies affect the sequential structure of interaction? The analyses reveal that: the medium mainly uses demonstrative questions; sitters generally confirm what the medium discloses, acknowledging her epistemic authority; when sitters do not confirm, the medium resorts to three main linguistic strategies attempting to (re)establish her authority; when the medium has to manage confirmation failures, the sequential structure becomes more complex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"215-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00067.bon\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00067.bon","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要尽管人们对超自然体验进行了广泛的调查，但对媒介-保姆互动的研究却少得多。本文摘录了意大利“公共媒介示范”的五个片段，主要目的是回答以下研究问题：（1）媒介用来管理其认识权威的语言策略，以及接受者用来承认、加强、抵制或质疑它的语言策略是什么？（2）这些策略如何影响交互的顺序结构？分析表明：中介主要使用指示问题；坐者通常确认媒介所揭示的内容，承认她的认识权威；当坐着者不确认时，媒介采用三种主要的语言策略试图（重新）建立她的权威；当介质必须管理确认失败时，顺序结构变得更加复杂。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Demonstrative questions and epistemic authority management in medium-sitter interactions

Abstract Although paranormal experiences have been broadly investigated, medium-sitter interactions have been studied much less. In this article, five excerpts from an Italian “public mediumship demonstration” are presented with the main aim to answer the following research questions: (1) what are the linguistic strategies used by the medium to manage her epistemic authority and by the sitters to acknowledge, strengthen, resist or contest it? (2) how do these strategies affect the sequential structure of interaction? The analyses reveal that: the medium mainly uses demonstrative questions; sitters generally confirm what the medium discloses, acknowledging her epistemic authority; when sitters do not confirm, the medium resorts to three main linguistic strategies attempting to (re)establish her authority; when the medium has to manage confirmation failures, the sequential structure becomes more complex.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.