宪法法院判例法对哥伦比亚立法进程的影响

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Precedente Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.18046/PREC.V11.2481
Y. Caicedo
{"title":"宪法法院判例法对哥伦比亚立法进程的影响","authors":"Y. Caicedo","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V11.2481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"11 1","pages":"53-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La influencia de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional en el proceso legislativo en Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Y. Caicedo\",\"doi\":\"10.18046/PREC.V11.2481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precedente\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"53-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precedente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V11.2481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precedente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V11.2481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在哥伦比亚,法规的实质性内容已开始以宪法法院在其判决中作出的解释、建议和命令为依据。但是,这种说法不能如此明确地扩展到程序要求。本文的目的是确定立法程序的一些先例,并开始反思哥伦比亚宪法法院的规则尚未能够充分影响哥伦比亚立法者的程序活动的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La influencia de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional en el proceso legislativo en Colombia
In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precedente
Precedente LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信