{"title":"媒介依赖:对Piccinini的神经认知机制的评论","authors":"M. Chirimuuta","doi":"10.53765/20512201.29.7.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary focuses on Piccinini's claim that neural signalling uses medium-independent vehicles, a claim which is crucial in the arguments given for the computational theory of cognition. I argue that Piccinini overestimates the role of spiking in the brain, and underestimates\n the significance of chemical signalling within and between neurons. There are important implications for how we should understand sui generis neural computation.","PeriodicalId":47796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Case for Medium Dependence: Comment on Neurocognitive Mechanisms by Gualtiero Piccinini\",\"authors\":\"M. Chirimuuta\",\"doi\":\"10.53765/20512201.29.7.185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary focuses on Piccinini's claim that neural signalling uses medium-independent vehicles, a claim which is crucial in the arguments given for the computational theory of cognition. I argue that Piccinini overestimates the role of spiking in the brain, and underestimates\\n the significance of chemical signalling within and between neurons. There are important implications for how we should understand sui generis neural computation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consciousness Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consciousness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.7.185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.7.185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Case for Medium Dependence: Comment on Neurocognitive Mechanisms by Gualtiero Piccinini
This commentary focuses on Piccinini's claim that neural signalling uses medium-independent vehicles, a claim which is crucial in the arguments given for the computational theory of cognition. I argue that Piccinini overestimates the role of spiking in the brain, and underestimates
the significance of chemical signalling within and between neurons. There are important implications for how we should understand sui generis neural computation.