法官弹劾:巴西与美利坚合众国的简要历史与比较分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Bruno Santos Cunha
{"title":"法官弹劾:巴西与美利坚合众国的简要历史与比较分析","authors":"Bruno Santos Cunha","doi":"10.14409/redoeda.v9i2.11082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to uncover some less known uses of the impeachment mechanism in Brazil and in the United States of America: judicial impeachment. On the one hand, it aims at discussing how impeachment relates to the removal of judges from public office in these two countries, namely when it comes to judges in the highest courts of the judicial branch (Supreme or Constitutional Court); on the other hand, the purpose is to discuss the connections between impeachment, judicial independence and accountability. The idea is to use comparative constitutional law methodology to address the historical background of impeachment and how it spread throughout different jurisdictions along the way before arriving in the Brazilian legal and constitutional scenario. In light of that, one of the most relevant sources will be found in precedents and legal doctrine regarding impeachment, with a significant focus on historical registers of its use and relation to judicial independence. The final objective is to test and investigate whether judicial impeachment can be seen or not as a mechanism that enhances judicial independence in countries that still adopt the practice, such as Brazil and the United States of America.","PeriodicalId":34052,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impeachment of judges: a brief historical and comparative analysis between Brazil and the United States of America\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Santos Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.14409/redoeda.v9i2.11082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to uncover some less known uses of the impeachment mechanism in Brazil and in the United States of America: judicial impeachment. On the one hand, it aims at discussing how impeachment relates to the removal of judges from public office in these two countries, namely when it comes to judges in the highest courts of the judicial branch (Supreme or Constitutional Court); on the other hand, the purpose is to discuss the connections between impeachment, judicial independence and accountability. The idea is to use comparative constitutional law methodology to address the historical background of impeachment and how it spread throughout different jurisdictions along the way before arriving in the Brazilian legal and constitutional scenario. In light of that, one of the most relevant sources will be found in precedents and legal doctrine regarding impeachment, with a significant focus on historical registers of its use and relation to judicial independence. The final objective is to test and investigate whether judicial impeachment can be seen or not as a mechanism that enhances judicial independence in countries that still adopt the practice, such as Brazil and the United States of America.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v9i2.11082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v9i2.11082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在揭示巴西和美国弹劾机制的一些鲜为人知的用途:司法弹劾。一方面,它旨在讨论弹劾与两国法官免职的关系,即司法部门最高法院(大法院或宪法法院)的法官;另一方面,目的是讨论弹劾,司法独立和问责制之间的联系。这个想法是使用比较宪法的方法来解决弹劾的历史背景,以及它在到达巴西法律和宪法场景之前如何在不同的司法管辖区传播。有鉴于此,最相关的来源之一将是有关弹劾的先例和法律理论,重点是其使用的历史记录及其与司法独立的关系。最后的目标是检验和调查在巴西和美利坚合众国等仍然采用司法弹劾的国家,是否可以将司法弹劾视为一种加强司法独立的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impeachment of judges: a brief historical and comparative analysis between Brazil and the United States of America
This article aims to uncover some less known uses of the impeachment mechanism in Brazil and in the United States of America: judicial impeachment. On the one hand, it aims at discussing how impeachment relates to the removal of judges from public office in these two countries, namely when it comes to judges in the highest courts of the judicial branch (Supreme or Constitutional Court); on the other hand, the purpose is to discuss the connections between impeachment, judicial independence and accountability. The idea is to use comparative constitutional law methodology to address the historical background of impeachment and how it spread throughout different jurisdictions along the way before arriving in the Brazilian legal and constitutional scenario. In light of that, one of the most relevant sources will be found in precedents and legal doctrine regarding impeachment, with a significant focus on historical registers of its use and relation to judicial independence. The final objective is to test and investigate whether judicial impeachment can be seen or not as a mechanism that enhances judicial independence in countries that still adopt the practice, such as Brazil and the United States of America.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信