知识管理对智能城市创新的贡献:制定规范性框架和研究议程的建议

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS
Darci de Borba, Rosiane Alves Palacios, E. Luciano, M. Chaves
{"title":"知识管理对智能城市创新的贡献:制定规范性框架和研究议程的建议","authors":"Darci de Borba, Rosiane Alves Palacios, E. Luciano, M. Chaves","doi":"10.5585/IJI.V8I3.18543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To verify how Knowledge Management (KM) is being associated with Smart Cities (SC) initiatives, through the analysis of the scientific production of both themes in indexing journals in the last 10 years. This article has three research questions: 1. What are the methodological approaches adopted to investigate research problems on KM in SC. 2. What are the research topics investigated on KM in SC? and 3. How is research on KM characterized in SC? Relevance/originality: This research analyzes how KM is associated with SC initiatives and proposes a research agenda on KM in SC. Methodology/approach: The method used was a semi-systematic literature review. Main results: The research found gaps concerning the adaptation of KM models in the context of SC, the selection of relevant variables for the analysis of KM in SC, the effect of KM on the results of SC initiatives, and how actions emerging issues of transparency and governance can influence or be influenced by KM. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article builds an overview of the collaboration of two fields in evidence today. In addition to the analysis of all articles in the sample, which includes quantitative data, the authors bring a proposed research agenda with the aim of promoting the maturation of the theme. The main theoretical contributions are in the proposal of the prescriptive framework and the research agenda. Social/management contributions: In a context of excess knowledge, decision-making becomes complex. Thus, understanding how KM can act in the complex context of SC helps managers to visualize alternatives to problems, selection, and organization of knowledge that affect decision-making.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":"8 1","pages":"516-540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The contribution of knowledge management to smart cities for innovation: proposal for a prescriptive framework and a research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Darci de Borba, Rosiane Alves Palacios, E. Luciano, M. Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/IJI.V8I3.18543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To verify how Knowledge Management (KM) is being associated with Smart Cities (SC) initiatives, through the analysis of the scientific production of both themes in indexing journals in the last 10 years. This article has three research questions: 1. What are the methodological approaches adopted to investigate research problems on KM in SC. 2. What are the research topics investigated on KM in SC? and 3. How is research on KM characterized in SC? Relevance/originality: This research analyzes how KM is associated with SC initiatives and proposes a research agenda on KM in SC. Methodology/approach: The method used was a semi-systematic literature review. Main results: The research found gaps concerning the adaptation of KM models in the context of SC, the selection of relevant variables for the analysis of KM in SC, the effect of KM on the results of SC initiatives, and how actions emerging issues of transparency and governance can influence or be influenced by KM. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article builds an overview of the collaboration of two fields in evidence today. In addition to the analysis of all articles in the sample, which includes quantitative data, the authors bring a proposed research agenda with the aim of promoting the maturation of the theme. The main theoretical contributions are in the proposal of the prescriptive framework and the research agenda. Social/management contributions: In a context of excess knowledge, decision-making becomes complex. Thus, understanding how KM can act in the complex context of SC helps managers to visualize alternatives to problems, selection, and organization of knowledge that affect decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"516-540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/IJI.V8I3.18543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/IJI.V8I3.18543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:通过分析过去10年中索引期刊中两个主题的科学成果,验证知识管理(KM)与智能城市(SC)倡议之间的关系。本文有三个研究问题:1。在SC中,对知识管理的研究问题采用了哪些方法论方法。供应链管理的研究主题是什么?和3。知识管理研究在供应链中的特征是什么?相关性/独创性:本研究分析了知识管理与供应链倡议的关系,并提出了供应链中知识管理的研究议程。方法论/方法:所用方法是半系统的文献综述。主要结果:研究发现,在SC背景下知识管理模型的适应性、SC中知识管理分析的相关变量的选择、知识管理对SC举措结果的影响,以及新出现的透明度和治理问题如何影响或受到知识管理的影响等方面存在差距。理论/方法论贡献:这篇文章概述了当今两个证据领域的合作。除了对样本中的所有文章进行分析(包括定量数据)外,作者还提出了一个拟议的研究议程,旨在促进主题的成熟。主要的理论贡献是提出了规范性框架和研究议程。社会/管理贡献:在知识过剩的背景下,决策变得复杂。因此,了解知识管理如何在复杂的供应链环境中发挥作用,有助于管理者可视化影响决策的问题、选择和知识组织的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The contribution of knowledge management to smart cities for innovation: proposal for a prescriptive framework and a research agenda
Objective: To verify how Knowledge Management (KM) is being associated with Smart Cities (SC) initiatives, through the analysis of the scientific production of both themes in indexing journals in the last 10 years. This article has three research questions: 1. What are the methodological approaches adopted to investigate research problems on KM in SC. 2. What are the research topics investigated on KM in SC? and 3. How is research on KM characterized in SC? Relevance/originality: This research analyzes how KM is associated with SC initiatives and proposes a research agenda on KM in SC. Methodology/approach: The method used was a semi-systematic literature review. Main results: The research found gaps concerning the adaptation of KM models in the context of SC, the selection of relevant variables for the analysis of KM in SC, the effect of KM on the results of SC initiatives, and how actions emerging issues of transparency and governance can influence or be influenced by KM. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article builds an overview of the collaboration of two fields in evidence today. In addition to the analysis of all articles in the sample, which includes quantitative data, the authors bring a proposed research agenda with the aim of promoting the maturation of the theme. The main theoretical contributions are in the proposal of the prescriptive framework and the research agenda. Social/management contributions: In a context of excess knowledge, decision-making becomes complex. Thus, understanding how KM can act in the complex context of SC helps managers to visualize alternatives to problems, selection, and organization of knowledge that affect decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信