白人、压抑的受害者和不宽容的左派的陪衬

Q2 Social Sciences

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863

C. Kelly

{"title":"白人、压抑的受害者和不宽容的左派的陪衬","authors":"C. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay argues that recent controversies over conservative speakers on college campuses are an opaque vehicle for White supremacy. Revisiting Herbert Marcuse’s concept of repressive tolerance through the lens of Critical Race Theory, this essay sketches the features of repressive victimhood: the advancement of categorical minority status orchestrated to shield white people from charges of intolerance while reframing counterspeech as commensurate with overt bigotry.","PeriodicalId":37756,"journal":{"name":"First Amendment Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"59 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whiteness, repressive victimhood, and the foil of the intolerant left\",\"authors\":\"C. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay argues that recent controversies over conservative speakers on college campuses are an opaque vehicle for White supremacy. Revisiting Herbert Marcuse’s concept of repressive tolerance through the lens of Critical Race Theory, this essay sketches the features of repressive victimhood: the advancement of categorical minority status orchestrated to shield white people from charges of intolerance while reframing counterspeech as commensurate with overt bigotry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Amendment Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文认为，最近关于大学校园保守派演讲者的争议是白人至上主义的不透明载体。本文通过批判种族理论的视角重新审视了赫伯特·马尔库塞(Herbert Marcuse)的压迫性宽容概念，勾勒出压迫性受害者的特征:精心策划的少数民族地位的进步，以保护白人免受不宽容的指控，同时将反言论重新定义为与公开的偏见相称。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Whiteness, repressive victimhood, and the foil of the intolerant left

ABSTRACT This essay argues that recent controversies over conservative speakers on college campuses are an opaque vehicle for White supremacy. Revisiting Herbert Marcuse’s concept of repressive tolerance through the lens of Critical Race Theory, this essay sketches the features of repressive victimhood: the advancement of categorical minority status orchestrated to shield white people from charges of intolerance while reframing counterspeech as commensurate with overt bigotry.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

First Amendment Studies Social Sciences-Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： First Amendment Studies publishes original scholarship on all aspects of free speech and embraces the full range of critical, historical, empirical, and descriptive methodologies. First Amendment Studies welcomes scholarship addressing areas including but not limited to: • doctrinal analysis of international and national free speech law and legislation • rhetorical analysis of cases and judicial rhetoric • theoretical and cultural issues related to free speech • the role of free speech in a wide variety of contexts (e.g., organizations, popular culture, traditional and new media).