既往精神病持续时间和氯氮平反应:一项使用电子健康记录的回顾性观察性研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rowena Jones, R. Upthegrove, M. Price, M. Pritchard, J. Chandan, S. Legge, J. MacCabe
{"title":"既往精神病持续时间和氯氮平反应:一项使用电子健康记录的回顾性观察性研究","authors":"Rowena Jones, R. Upthegrove, M. Price, M. Pritchard, J. Chandan, S. Legge, J. MacCabe","doi":"10.1177/20451253221103353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clozapine is the gold-standard medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) yet its initiation is often delayed. Objective: To examine whether earlier initiation of clozapine in TRS is associated with lower Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) scores at 2 years. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from electronic health records of patients with first adequate trial of clozapine at the South London and Maudsley mental health service between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Dates of illness onset and clozapine commencement were manually extracted from anonymised case notes. CGI-S scores were rated blind to illness duration. Ordinal logistic regression was used to describe the association between illness duration at baseline and CGI-S outcome score at 2 years, following adjustment for CGI-S start score and other key covariates. Results: Among the 401 patients included, there was an association between illness duration and CGI-S outcome score with a 4% increase in the odds of a higher (worse) outcome CGI-S score per year of illness [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.06]. The association between illness duration and clozapine response was most marked at less than 4 years illness duration. There were too few clozapine initiations within the first 2 years of illness to draw any conclusions about early clozapine initiation. Conclusion: Initiation of clozapine within 2–4 years of psychotic illness onset offers the best outcome for TRS, but the advantage, if any, of earlier initiation is unclear from these data.","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of prior psychotic illness and clozapine response: a retrospective observational study using electronic health records\",\"authors\":\"Rowena Jones, R. Upthegrove, M. Price, M. Pritchard, J. Chandan, S. Legge, J. MacCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253221103353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clozapine is the gold-standard medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) yet its initiation is often delayed. Objective: To examine whether earlier initiation of clozapine in TRS is associated with lower Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) scores at 2 years. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from electronic health records of patients with first adequate trial of clozapine at the South London and Maudsley mental health service between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Dates of illness onset and clozapine commencement were manually extracted from anonymised case notes. CGI-S scores were rated blind to illness duration. Ordinal logistic regression was used to describe the association between illness duration at baseline and CGI-S outcome score at 2 years, following adjustment for CGI-S start score and other key covariates. Results: Among the 401 patients included, there was an association between illness duration and CGI-S outcome score with a 4% increase in the odds of a higher (worse) outcome CGI-S score per year of illness [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.06]. The association between illness duration and clozapine response was most marked at less than 4 years illness duration. There were too few clozapine initiations within the first 2 years of illness to draw any conclusions about early clozapine initiation. Conclusion: Initiation of clozapine within 2–4 years of psychotic illness onset offers the best outcome for TRS, but the advantage, if any, of earlier initiation is unclear from these data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221103353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221103353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:氯氮平是治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的金标准药物,但它的起始常常被推迟。目的:研究TRS患者较早开始使用氯氮平是否与2年时较低的临床总体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)评分有关。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,来自2007年1月1日至2016年12月31日在南伦敦和莫兹利精神卫生服务中心进行氯氮平首次充分试验的患者的电子健康记录。发病日期和氯氮平开始从匿名病例记录中手动提取。CGI-S评分与病程无关。在调整CGI-S起始评分和其他关键协变量后,采用有序逻辑回归来描述基线时病程与2年CGI-S结局评分之间的关系。结果:在所纳入的401例患者中,病程与CGI-S结果评分之间存在相关性,每患病一年出现更高(更差)结果CGI-S评分的几率增加4%[校正优势比(AOR) = 1.04;95%置信区间(CI): 1.01-1.06]。病程与氯氮平反应之间的关系在病程少于4年时最为显著。在疾病的前2年内,很少有氯氮平开始使用,因此无法得出关于早期氯氮平开始使用的任何结论。结论:精神病发病2-4年内开始使用氯氮平对TRS疗效最好,但从这些数据来看,较早开始使用氯氮平是否有优势尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Duration of prior psychotic illness and clozapine response: a retrospective observational study using electronic health records
Background: Clozapine is the gold-standard medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) yet its initiation is often delayed. Objective: To examine whether earlier initiation of clozapine in TRS is associated with lower Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) scores at 2 years. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from electronic health records of patients with first adequate trial of clozapine at the South London and Maudsley mental health service between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Dates of illness onset and clozapine commencement were manually extracted from anonymised case notes. CGI-S scores were rated blind to illness duration. Ordinal logistic regression was used to describe the association between illness duration at baseline and CGI-S outcome score at 2 years, following adjustment for CGI-S start score and other key covariates. Results: Among the 401 patients included, there was an association between illness duration and CGI-S outcome score with a 4% increase in the odds of a higher (worse) outcome CGI-S score per year of illness [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.06]. The association between illness duration and clozapine response was most marked at less than 4 years illness duration. There were too few clozapine initiations within the first 2 years of illness to draw any conclusions about early clozapine initiation. Conclusion: Initiation of clozapine within 2–4 years of psychotic illness onset offers the best outcome for TRS, but the advantage, if any, of earlier initiation is unclear from these data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信