在俄罗斯民事法律纠纷公证和司法实践中提供电子互联网证据

Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1073
A. Kravchenko, Aleksey I. Ovchinnikov, A. A. Romanov, T. Kareva
{"title":"在俄罗斯民事法律纠纷公证和司法实践中提供电子互联网证据","authors":"A. Kravchenko, Aleksey I. Ovchinnikov, A. A. Romanov, T. Kareva","doi":"10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study is mainly devoted to the analysis of the current Russian legislation and the emerging notarial and judicial practice in the field of providing electronic evidence, the features and problems of procedures for their notarization, the relevance and admissibility of electronic evidence in civil law disputes in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts as a factor in stabilizing civil law turnover carried out in information and communication formats (digital economy). Moreover, the study considers the problems of legal recording electronic traces while noting the most significant aspects of this recording of the evidence and formulating recommendations for notaries and parties to judicial disputes. To that aim, a range of general scientific methods, including observational, descriptive, and qualitative approaches, are used. Based on the results, the Russian regulatory system must have mechanisms for fixing traces of such civil activity to use them as evidence in civil and arbitration disputes.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing electronic internet evidence in Russian notarial and judicial practice for civil law disputes\",\"authors\":\"A. Kravchenko, Aleksey I. Ovchinnikov, A. A. Romanov, T. Kareva\",\"doi\":\"10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study is mainly devoted to the analysis of the current Russian legislation and the emerging notarial and judicial practice in the field of providing electronic evidence, the features and problems of procedures for their notarization, the relevance and admissibility of electronic evidence in civil law disputes in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts as a factor in stabilizing civil law turnover carried out in information and communication formats (digital economy). Moreover, the study considers the problems of legal recording electronic traces while noting the most significant aspects of this recording of the evidence and formulating recommendations for notaries and parties to judicial disputes. To that aim, a range of general scientific methods, including observational, descriptive, and qualitative approaches, are used. Based on the results, the Russian regulatory system must have mechanisms for fixing traces of such civil activity to use them as evidence in civil and arbitration disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究主要致力于分析俄罗斯在提供电子证据领域的现行立法和新兴的公证和司法实践,其公证程序的特点和问题,电子证据在普通管辖法院和仲裁法院的民法纠纷中的相关性和可采性,是稳定以信息和通信格式(数字经济)进行的民法流转的一个因素。此外,该研究考虑了法律记录电子痕迹的问题,同时注意到这种证据记录的最重要方面,并为公证人和司法纠纷当事方提出了建议。为此,使用了一系列通用的科学方法,包括观察、描述和定性方法。根据这些结果,俄罗斯监管系统必须有机制来固定此类民事活动的痕迹,以便将其用作民事和仲裁纠纷的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Providing electronic internet evidence in Russian notarial and judicial practice for civil law disputes
The current study is mainly devoted to the analysis of the current Russian legislation and the emerging notarial and judicial practice in the field of providing electronic evidence, the features and problems of procedures for their notarization, the relevance and admissibility of electronic evidence in civil law disputes in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts as a factor in stabilizing civil law turnover carried out in information and communication formats (digital economy). Moreover, the study considers the problems of legal recording electronic traces while noting the most significant aspects of this recording of the evidence and formulating recommendations for notaries and parties to judicial disputes. To that aim, a range of general scientific methods, including observational, descriptive, and qualitative approaches, are used. Based on the results, the Russian regulatory system must have mechanisms for fixing traces of such civil activity to use them as evidence in civil and arbitration disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信