大流行病危机中的环境承诺和言论:亚投行、欧亚经济联盟和欧盟的社交媒体和合法性

IF 2.2 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Post-Communist Economies Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824

Stephen G. F. Hall, Tobias Lenz, Anastassia V. Obydenkova

{"title":"大流行病危机中的环境承诺和言论:亚投行、欧亚经济联盟和欧盟的社交媒体和合法性","authors":"Stephen G. F. Hall, Tobias Lenz, Anastassia V. Obydenkova","doi":"10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) legitimise their right to rule in times of a Pandemic? Where are their previously made environmental commitments on their agenda during a crisis? What are the differences in self-legitimation, if any, across different types of IOs? These questions have gathered renewed urgency during the ongoing COVID-19 and climate change crises posing a threat to the legitimacy not only of national governments but also of IOs. The paper aims to address these questions through the analysis of environmental commitments made in legal documents of three IOs (the EU, the EAEU, and the AIIB) and through the analysis of their respective social media between 2017 and 2021. Among other issues, we find significant differences in self-legitimation strategies of these three IOs as reflected by their social media and some evidence of mimicry across these IOs that should remain on the agenda for further studies.","PeriodicalId":46517,"journal":{"name":"Post-Communist Economies","volume":"34 1","pages":"577 - 602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU\",\"authors\":\"Stephen G. F. Hall, Tobias Lenz, Anastassia V. Obydenkova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) legitimise their right to rule in times of a Pandemic? Where are their previously made environmental commitments on their agenda during a crisis? What are the differences in self-legitimation, if any, across different types of IOs? These questions have gathered renewed urgency during the ongoing COVID-19 and climate change crises posing a threat to the legitimacy not only of national governments but also of IOs. The paper aims to address these questions through the analysis of environmental commitments made in legal documents of three IOs (the EU, the EAEU, and the AIIB) and through the analysis of their respective social media between 2017 and 2021. Among other issues, we find significant differences in self-legitimation strategies of these three IOs as reflected by their social media and some evidence of mimicry across these IOs that should remain on the agenda for further studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Communist Economies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"577 - 602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Communist Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Communist Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18

摘要

摘要国际组织如何在疫情期间使其统治权合法化？在危机期间，他们之前在议程上做出的环境承诺在哪里？不同类型的IO在自我合法化方面有什么区别（如果有的话）？在持续的新冠肺炎和气候变化危机中，这些问题再次变得紧迫，这不仅威胁到国家政府的合法性，也威胁到国际组织的合法性。本文旨在通过分析三个国际组织（欧盟、EAEU和亚投行）在法律文件中做出的环境承诺，并通过分析2017年至2021年间各自的社交媒体来解决这些问题。在其他问题中，我们发现这三个IO的自我合法化策略存在显著差异，这反映在它们的社交媒体上，以及这些IO之间模仿的一些证据上，这些证据应该保留在进一步研究的议程上。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU

ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) legitimise their right to rule in times of a Pandemic? Where are their previously made environmental commitments on their agenda during a crisis? What are the differences in self-legitimation, if any, across different types of IOs? These questions have gathered renewed urgency during the ongoing COVID-19 and climate change crises posing a threat to the legitimacy not only of national governments but also of IOs. The paper aims to address these questions through the analysis of environmental commitments made in legal documents of three IOs (the EU, the EAEU, and the AIIB) and through the analysis of their respective social media between 2017 and 2021. Among other issues, we find significant differences in self-legitimation strategies of these three IOs as reflected by their social media and some evidence of mimicry across these IOs that should remain on the agenda for further studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Post-Communist Economies ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Post-Communist Economies publishes key research and policy articles in the analysis of post-communist economies. The basic transformation in the past two decades through stabilisation, liberalisation and privatisation has been completed in virtually all of the former communist countries, but despite the dramatic changes that have taken place, the post-communist economies still form a clearly identifiable group, distinguished by the impact of the years of communist rule. Post-communist economies still present distinctive problems that make them a particular focus of research.