2013-2020年加蓬医疗实践职业暴露评估

Q1 Health Professions
P. Ondo Meye , S.Y. Loemba Mouandza , G.B. Dallou , Y. Omon , B.C. Mabika Ndjembidouma , C. Chaley , G.H. Ben-Bolie
{"title":"2013-2020年加蓬医疗实践职业暴露评估","authors":"P. Ondo Meye ,&nbsp;S.Y. Loemba Mouandza ,&nbsp;G.B. Dallou ,&nbsp;Y. Omon ,&nbsp;B.C. Mabika Ndjembidouma ,&nbsp;C. Chaley ,&nbsp;G.H. Ben-Bolie","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whole-body, extremity and eye-lens occupational dose equivalents of ionizing radiation to Occupationally Exposed Workers (OEWs) in Gabon, monitored by the national Individual Monitoring Service (IMS), in the medical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 816 dose records for 205 OEWs were evaluated. Doses were collected for an eight-year period, from 2013 to 2020. Twelve public and private hospitals were involved, including a cancer centre where radiotherapy (RT) and nuclear medicine (NM) procedures are regularly performed. OEWs were monitored, on a monthly or quarterly basis, for whole-body dose and extremity dose using an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter worn on the torso or the wrist, as appropriate. Eye-lens dose was estimated from whole-body dose results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The whole-body dose distribution was skewed and the zero dose was associated with a probability of 47%. Some recorded doses were associated with estimated X-ray energies above those typically encountered in diagnostic radiology, thus suggesting that some doses attributed to workers and believed to be due to X-rays may in fact be due to background radiation (false positive dose records). For the period 2013–2020, annual doses to OEWs in diagnostic radiology (DR), NM and RT departments were 0.40 ​mSv, 0.38 ​mSv and 0.09 ​mSv, respectively. For the same period, the mean annual extremity and eye-lens doses were 0.78 ​mSv (range: 0–5.24 ​mSv) and 0.35 ​mSv (range: 0–3.74 ​mSv), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>With little effort by the national IMS and the regulatory body, annual whole-body doses to workers can be kept well below 6 ​mSv, thus efficiently contributing to the optimization of worker's protection. However, extremity doses may in fact be greater than those reported for OEWs in the NM department. Finally, eye-lens doses were well below the new annual dose limit of 20 ​mSv, thus demonstrating that, in the current situation, OEWs in the NM department do not require routine eye lens dose monitoring. Rather, whole-body dose may be used as an indicator of eye-lens dose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of occupational exposure in medical practice in Gabon during 2013–2020\",\"authors\":\"P. Ondo Meye ,&nbsp;S.Y. Loemba Mouandza ,&nbsp;G.B. Dallou ,&nbsp;Y. Omon ,&nbsp;B.C. Mabika Ndjembidouma ,&nbsp;C. Chaley ,&nbsp;G.H. Ben-Bolie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whole-body, extremity and eye-lens occupational dose equivalents of ionizing radiation to Occupationally Exposed Workers (OEWs) in Gabon, monitored by the national Individual Monitoring Service (IMS), in the medical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 816 dose records for 205 OEWs were evaluated. Doses were collected for an eight-year period, from 2013 to 2020. Twelve public and private hospitals were involved, including a cancer centre where radiotherapy (RT) and nuclear medicine (NM) procedures are regularly performed. OEWs were monitored, on a monthly or quarterly basis, for whole-body dose and extremity dose using an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter worn on the torso or the wrist, as appropriate. Eye-lens dose was estimated from whole-body dose results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The whole-body dose distribution was skewed and the zero dose was associated with a probability of 47%. Some recorded doses were associated with estimated X-ray energies above those typically encountered in diagnostic radiology, thus suggesting that some doses attributed to workers and believed to be due to X-rays may in fact be due to background radiation (false positive dose records). For the period 2013–2020, annual doses to OEWs in diagnostic radiology (DR), NM and RT departments were 0.40 ​mSv, 0.38 ​mSv and 0.09 ​mSv, respectively. For the same period, the mean annual extremity and eye-lens doses were 0.78 ​mSv (range: 0–5.24 ​mSv) and 0.35 ​mSv (range: 0–3.74 ​mSv), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>With little effort by the national IMS and the regulatory body, annual whole-body doses to workers can be kept well below 6 ​mSv, thus efficiently contributing to the optimization of worker's protection. However, extremity doses may in fact be greater than those reported for OEWs in the NM department. Finally, eye-lens doses were well below the new annual dose limit of 20 ​mSv, thus demonstrating that, in the current situation, OEWs in the NM department do not require routine eye lens dose monitoring. Rather, whole-body dose may be used as an indicator of eye-lens dose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价加蓬职业暴露工人(OEWs)在医疗实践中受到的全身、四肢和眼睛透镜电离辐射的职业剂量当量,由国家个人监测服务(IMS)监测。方法对205例OEWs共816份剂量记录进行评价。从2013年到2020年,收集了8年的剂量。共有12家公立和私立医院参与其中,包括一家定期进行放射治疗和核医学治疗的癌症中心。每月或每季度监测OEWs的全身剂量和四肢剂量,视情况使用佩戴在躯干或手腕上的光刺激发光(OSL)剂量计。眼透镜剂量根据全身剂量结果估计。结果全身剂量分布呈偏态,零剂量相关概率为47%。一些记录的剂量与估计的x射线能量有关,高于诊断放射学中通常遇到的x射线能量,因此表明归于工作人员并被认为是由x射线引起的一些剂量实际上可能是由本底辐射引起的(假阳性剂量记录)。2013-2020年期间,诊断放射科(DR)、NM和RT部门OEWs的年剂量分别为0.40 mSv、0.38 mSv和0.09 mSv。同期,四肢和眼晶体的年平均剂量分别为0.78毫西弗(范围0-5.24毫西弗)和0.35毫西弗(范围0-3.74毫西弗)。结论国家IMS和监管机构只需付出很小的努力,就可以将工人的年全身剂量控制在6 mSv以下,从而有效地优化工人的防护。然而,肢体的剂量实际上可能比神经科报道的OEWs的剂量要大。最后,眼晶状体剂量远低于新的年剂量限值20毫西弗,从而表明,在目前情况下,NM科的OEWs不需要常规的眼晶状体剂量监测。相反,全身剂量可以作为眼晶状体剂量的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of occupational exposure in medical practice in Gabon during 2013–2020

Objective

To evaluate whole-body, extremity and eye-lens occupational dose equivalents of ionizing radiation to Occupationally Exposed Workers (OEWs) in Gabon, monitored by the national Individual Monitoring Service (IMS), in the medical practice.

Methods

A total of 816 dose records for 205 OEWs were evaluated. Doses were collected for an eight-year period, from 2013 to 2020. Twelve public and private hospitals were involved, including a cancer centre where radiotherapy (RT) and nuclear medicine (NM) procedures are regularly performed. OEWs were monitored, on a monthly or quarterly basis, for whole-body dose and extremity dose using an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter worn on the torso or the wrist, as appropriate. Eye-lens dose was estimated from whole-body dose results.

Results

The whole-body dose distribution was skewed and the zero dose was associated with a probability of 47%. Some recorded doses were associated with estimated X-ray energies above those typically encountered in diagnostic radiology, thus suggesting that some doses attributed to workers and believed to be due to X-rays may in fact be due to background radiation (false positive dose records). For the period 2013–2020, annual doses to OEWs in diagnostic radiology (DR), NM and RT departments were 0.40 ​mSv, 0.38 ​mSv and 0.09 ​mSv, respectively. For the same period, the mean annual extremity and eye-lens doses were 0.78 ​mSv (range: 0–5.24 ​mSv) and 0.35 ​mSv (range: 0–3.74 ​mSv), respectively.

Conclusion

With little effort by the national IMS and the regulatory body, annual whole-body doses to workers can be kept well below 6 ​mSv, thus efficiently contributing to the optimization of worker's protection. However, extremity doses may in fact be greater than those reported for OEWs in the NM department. Finally, eye-lens doses were well below the new annual dose limit of 20 ​mSv, thus demonstrating that, in the current situation, OEWs in the NM department do not require routine eye lens dose monitoring. Rather, whole-body dose may be used as an indicator of eye-lens dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信