直接前路和后外侧入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术的比较

Ruixia Zhu, Gongyin Zhao, Liangliang Wang, Shijie Jiang, Nanwei Xu, Jiao Xiaojun, Yuji Wang
{"title":"直接前路和后外侧入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术的比较","authors":"Ruixia Zhu, Gongyin Zhao, Liangliang Wang, Shijie Jiang, Nanwei Xu, Jiao Xiaojun, Yuji Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PA) in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 67 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to December 2017. There were 25 males and 42 females, aged 60-90 years [(76.1±7.6)years]. There were 31 patients with right femoral neck fracture and 36 with left femoral neck fracture, all of whom underwent operations within 72 hours after injury. There were 18 patients with type III and 49 with type IV according to Garden typing. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Direct anterior approach (DAA) was performed in 36 patients (DAA group) and posterior approach (PA) was performed in 31 patients (PA group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss, total blood loss, the time when the patients got out of bed, and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint function one month after operation. The complications of the two groups were recorded. \n \n \nResults \nAll patients were followed up for 3-6 weeks, with an average of one month. The operation time of DAA group was longer than that of PA group [(75.0±10.5)minutes vs. (54.0±11.4)minutes] (P 0.05). DAA group had shorter durations in terms of the time when patients got out of bed [(23.7±18.1)hours vs. (35.1±22.5)hours] (P 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included femoral periprosthetic fracture in three patients, lateral femoral nerve injury in two patients and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion in two patients in DAA group. In the PA group, there was one patient with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity at one month after operation, two patients with posterior dislocation of the hip, four patients with periprosthetic fracture and four patients with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nFor femoral neck fracture in the elderly, compared with PA hip arthroplasty, DAA hip arthroplasty has less bleeding, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay, with satisfactory short-term results. \n \n \nKey words: \nFemoral neck fractures; Hip arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Recessive blood loss","PeriodicalId":10161,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"730-735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures\",\"authors\":\"Ruixia Zhu, Gongyin Zhao, Liangliang Wang, Shijie Jiang, Nanwei Xu, Jiao Xiaojun, Yuji Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the efficacy of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PA) in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 67 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to December 2017. There were 25 males and 42 females, aged 60-90 years [(76.1±7.6)years]. There were 31 patients with right femoral neck fracture and 36 with left femoral neck fracture, all of whom underwent operations within 72 hours after injury. There were 18 patients with type III and 49 with type IV according to Garden typing. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Direct anterior approach (DAA) was performed in 36 patients (DAA group) and posterior approach (PA) was performed in 31 patients (PA group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss, total blood loss, the time when the patients got out of bed, and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint function one month after operation. The complications of the two groups were recorded. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAll patients were followed up for 3-6 weeks, with an average of one month. The operation time of DAA group was longer than that of PA group [(75.0±10.5)minutes vs. (54.0±11.4)minutes] (P 0.05). DAA group had shorter durations in terms of the time when patients got out of bed [(23.7±18.1)hours vs. (35.1±22.5)hours] (P 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included femoral periprosthetic fracture in three patients, lateral femoral nerve injury in two patients and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion in two patients in DAA group. In the PA group, there was one patient with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity at one month after operation, two patients with posterior dislocation of the hip, four patients with periprosthetic fracture and four patients with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion (P>0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nFor femoral neck fracture in the elderly, compared with PA hip arthroplasty, DAA hip arthroplasty has less bleeding, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay, with satisfactory short-term results. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nFemoral neck fractures; Hip arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Recessive blood loss\",\"PeriodicalId\":10161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤杂志\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"730-735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较直接前方入路(DAA)和后外侧入路(PA)在老年股骨颈骨折患者髋关节置换术中的疗效。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究,对南京医科大学附属医院常州市第二人民医院2015年7月至2017年12月收治的67例老年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料进行分析。男25例,女42例,年龄60~90岁[(76.1±7.6)岁],右股骨颈骨折31例,左股骨颈骨折36例,均在伤后72小时内手术治疗。根据Garden分型,有18名患者为III型,49名患者为IV型。所有患者均接受全髋关节置换术治疗。36例患者(DAA组)采用直接前方入路(DAA),31例患者(PA组)采用后方入路(PA)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、隐性出血量、总出血量、下床时间、住院时间。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Harris评分对术后1个月髋关节功能进行评价。记录两组患者的并发症。结果所有患者随访3-6周,平均1个月。DAA组的手术时间比PA组长[(75.0±10.5)minvs.(54.0±11.4)min](P<0.05)。DAA组患者下床时间短[(23.7±18.1)小时vs.(35.1±22.5)小时](P>0.05),DAA组2例发生股外侧神经损伤,2例发生需要输血的严重贫血。PA组术后1个月出现下肢深静脉血栓形成1例,髋关节后脱位2例,假体周围骨折4例,严重贫血需要输血4例(P>0.05),DAA髋关节置换术出血少,下床时间早,住院时间短,短期效果满意。关键词:股骨颈骨折;髋关节置换术、置换术、髋关节;隐性失血
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures
Objective To compare the efficacy of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PA) in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 67 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to December 2017. There were 25 males and 42 females, aged 60-90 years [(76.1±7.6)years]. There were 31 patients with right femoral neck fracture and 36 with left femoral neck fracture, all of whom underwent operations within 72 hours after injury. There were 18 patients with type III and 49 with type IV according to Garden typing. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Direct anterior approach (DAA) was performed in 36 patients (DAA group) and posterior approach (PA) was performed in 31 patients (PA group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss, total blood loss, the time when the patients got out of bed, and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint function one month after operation. The complications of the two groups were recorded. Results All patients were followed up for 3-6 weeks, with an average of one month. The operation time of DAA group was longer than that of PA group [(75.0±10.5)minutes vs. (54.0±11.4)minutes] (P 0.05). DAA group had shorter durations in terms of the time when patients got out of bed [(23.7±18.1)hours vs. (35.1±22.5)hours] (P 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included femoral periprosthetic fracture in three patients, lateral femoral nerve injury in two patients and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion in two patients in DAA group. In the PA group, there was one patient with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity at one month after operation, two patients with posterior dislocation of the hip, four patients with periprosthetic fracture and four patients with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion (P>0.05). Conclusion For femoral neck fracture in the elderly, compared with PA hip arthroplasty, DAA hip arthroplasty has less bleeding, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay, with satisfactory short-term results. Key words: Femoral neck fractures; Hip arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Recessive blood loss
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11327
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Trauma (International Standard Serial Publication Number: ISSN 1001-8050, Domestic Uniform Serial Publication Number: CN 50-1098/R) was founded in September 1985, which is the only high-level medical professional academic journal that can comprehensively and systematically reflect the achievements and development trends of China's traumatology medicine, and has a wide academic influence in China's traumatology medicine community. It has a wide range of academic influence in China's trauma medicine. Chinese Journal of Trauma is a source journal of China Science and Technology Paper Statistics, a source journal of China Science Citation Database (CSCD), a core journal of China Comprehensive Medicine and Health Care, a source journal of China Academic Journals Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), a full-text journal of China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), a core academic journal of China Center for Scientific Evaluation (RCCSE), a core academic journal of China Traumatology and Traumatology Center (CTC), a core academic journal of China Traumatology Center (RCCSE). RCCSE) core academic journals; Chinese Biomedical Journal Database (CMCC), Chinese Biomedical Journal Citation Database (CBJCED), China Journal Network (CJN), China Academic Journals (CD-ROM), Chinese Academic Journals Abstracts (Chinese Edition), Chemical Abstracts of the United States (CA), Index Copernicus of Poland (IC), and Japan Institute of Science and Technology Database (JICST), World Health Organization Western Pacific Region Medical Search (WPRIM) and Russian Journal of Abstracts (ΡЖ) included journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信