减少医护人员因病缺勤的干预措施:一项系统综述

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. Simmons, Arwel W. Jones, N. Siriwardena, C. Bridle
{"title":"减少医护人员因病缺勤的干预措施:一项系统综述","authors":"L. Simmons, Arwel W. Jones, N. Siriwardena, C. Bridle","doi":"10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSickness absence is a major concern for healthcare services and their employees with healthcare workers having higher sickness absence rates compared to the general population. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review randomised control trials (RCTs) that aimed to reduce sickness absence among healthcare workers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic review was conducted that aimed to include RCTs with study participants who were employed in any part of the healthcare sector. This review included any type of intervention with the primary outcome measure being sickness absence.\n\n\nFindings\nSeven studies were included in the review and consisted of one exercise-only intervention, three multicomponent intervention programmes, two influenza vaccination interventions and one process consultation. Three studies (exercise-only, one multicomponent intervention programme and one influenza vaccination intervention) were able to demonstrate a reduction in sickness absence compared to control.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDue to the lack of high-quality evidence, this review identified that there are currently no interventions that healthcare organisations are able to use to effectively reduce sickness absence among their employees. This review also highlights the importance of a standardised measure of sickness absence for healthcare staff, such as shifts.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review to synthesise such evidence among healthcare workers.\n","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to reduce sickness absence among healthcare workers: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"L. Simmons, Arwel W. Jones, N. Siriwardena, C. Bridle\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nSickness absence is a major concern for healthcare services and their employees with healthcare workers having higher sickness absence rates compared to the general population. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review randomised control trials (RCTs) that aimed to reduce sickness absence among healthcare workers.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA systematic review was conducted that aimed to include RCTs with study participants who were employed in any part of the healthcare sector. This review included any type of intervention with the primary outcome measure being sickness absence.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nSeven studies were included in the review and consisted of one exercise-only intervention, three multicomponent intervention programmes, two influenza vaccination interventions and one process consultation. Three studies (exercise-only, one multicomponent intervention programme and one influenza vaccination intervention) were able to demonstrate a reduction in sickness absence compared to control.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nDue to the lack of high-quality evidence, this review identified that there are currently no interventions that healthcare organisations are able to use to effectively reduce sickness absence among their employees. This review also highlights the importance of a standardised measure of sickness absence for healthcare staff, such as shifts.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review to synthesise such evidence among healthcare workers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emergency Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emergency Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-05-2018-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

病假缺勤是卫生保健服务及其雇员的一个主要问题,与一般人群相比,卫生保健工作者的病假缺勤率更高。本文的目的是系统地回顾随机对照试验(rct),旨在减少疾病缺勤在医护人员。设计/方法学/方法进行了一项系统评价,旨在纳入在医疗保健部门任何部门工作的研究参与者的随机对照试验。本综述包括以病假为主要结局指标的任何类型的干预措施。结果:本综述纳入了7项研究,包括1项运动干预、3项多组分干预、2项流感疫苗干预和1项过程咨询。三项研究(仅运动、一项多组分干预计划和一项流感疫苗接种干预)能够证明与对照组相比,缺勤率有所降低。研究的局限性/意义由于缺乏高质量的证据,本综述确定,目前没有干预措施,医疗机构能够有效地减少员工的病假。这篇综述还强调了医疗人员病假的标准化衡量的重要性,比如轮班。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个在医疗工作者中综合此类证据的系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to reduce sickness absence among healthcare workers: a systematic review
Purpose Sickness absence is a major concern for healthcare services and their employees with healthcare workers having higher sickness absence rates compared to the general population. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review randomised control trials (RCTs) that aimed to reduce sickness absence among healthcare workers. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review was conducted that aimed to include RCTs with study participants who were employed in any part of the healthcare sector. This review included any type of intervention with the primary outcome measure being sickness absence. Findings Seven studies were included in the review and consisted of one exercise-only intervention, three multicomponent intervention programmes, two influenza vaccination interventions and one process consultation. Three studies (exercise-only, one multicomponent intervention programme and one influenza vaccination intervention) were able to demonstrate a reduction in sickness absence compared to control. Research limitations/implications Due to the lack of high-quality evidence, this review identified that there are currently no interventions that healthcare organisations are able to use to effectively reduce sickness absence among their employees. This review also highlights the importance of a standardised measure of sickness absence for healthcare staff, such as shifts. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review to synthesise such evidence among healthcare workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信