文化取向(绩效和社会性)对国家创新的影响:轨迹分析视角

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Agustin Ramirrez-Urraya, Diana Escandón-Barbosa, Jairo Salas
{"title":"文化取向(绩效和社会性)对国家创新的影响:轨迹分析视角","authors":"Agustin Ramirrez-Urraya, Diana Escandón-Barbosa, Jairo Salas","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-03-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the effects of cultural orientations (performance and sociality) on the trajectories of innovation inputs and their results in different countries worldwide between 2011 and 2021.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAs a technique for data analysis, one of the spatial Bayesian models and Gray forecasting methods is used. This technique is adequate to achieve the objectives of the investigation because it allows analyzing how the variables move in time ranges and allow the generation of forecasts. This model also allows knowing if there are spills, which investing in a country can positively affect countries with geographical proximity. The databases used were the Global Innovation Index with data from 131 nations and the Globe Project with data from 157 countries between 2011 and 2021. The variables analyzed are institutions, human capital, research infrastructure, market sophistication and business sophistication. On the other hand, regarding moderations of cultural orientations, The Globe Project developed two factors: performance orientation (high degree of masculinity, avoidance of ambiguity, power distance and future orientation) and humane orientation (high-level of femininity, institutional and societal collectivism).\n\n\nFindings\nThe results reveal that all inputs grow at different rates over time. In the case of institutions, it is the most difficult to generate changes over time. However, human capital, market sophistication and business sophistication are the ones that have grown the most over time, regardless of the country’s cultural orientation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAmong the main limitations is the set of data used because it only considers one approach to culture, especially the one considered by Hofstede. However, other approaches could help evaluate the results of this research. Considering the results obtained, the study attempts to provide a different view of the effects of cultural variables on companies’ innovation performance in different countries in the world. In the same way, evaluating these effects allows firms to consider variables associated with the country that will affect the strategies and performance of the firm.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results achieved make it possible to strengthen the analysis of the countries’ strategies when it comes to innovation, especially in the permanent evaluation of the results that allow to encourage changes in the execution of innovative activities to maintain their performance over time.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe contributions allow us to understand the dynamics of innovation in the knowledge and creative outputs of countries over time.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe trajectory analysis used in the data analysis is perhaps one of the most robust techniques that makes a time series analysis. This allows identifying trajectories for the independent variables of the study and their influence on the innovation of the country.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of cultural orientations (performance and sociality) on country innovation: a trajectories analysis perspective\",\"authors\":\"Agustin Ramirrez-Urraya, Diana Escandón-Barbosa, Jairo Salas\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jstpm-03-2022-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to analyze the effects of cultural orientations (performance and sociality) on the trajectories of innovation inputs and their results in different countries worldwide between 2011 and 2021.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAs a technique for data analysis, one of the spatial Bayesian models and Gray forecasting methods is used. This technique is adequate to achieve the objectives of the investigation because it allows analyzing how the variables move in time ranges and allow the generation of forecasts. This model also allows knowing if there are spills, which investing in a country can positively affect countries with geographical proximity. The databases used were the Global Innovation Index with data from 131 nations and the Globe Project with data from 157 countries between 2011 and 2021. The variables analyzed are institutions, human capital, research infrastructure, market sophistication and business sophistication. On the other hand, regarding moderations of cultural orientations, The Globe Project developed two factors: performance orientation (high degree of masculinity, avoidance of ambiguity, power distance and future orientation) and humane orientation (high-level of femininity, institutional and societal collectivism).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results reveal that all inputs grow at different rates over time. In the case of institutions, it is the most difficult to generate changes over time. However, human capital, market sophistication and business sophistication are the ones that have grown the most over time, regardless of the country’s cultural orientation.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nAmong the main limitations is the set of data used because it only considers one approach to culture, especially the one considered by Hofstede. However, other approaches could help evaluate the results of this research. Considering the results obtained, the study attempts to provide a different view of the effects of cultural variables on companies’ innovation performance in different countries in the world. In the same way, evaluating these effects allows firms to consider variables associated with the country that will affect the strategies and performance of the firm.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe results achieved make it possible to strengthen the analysis of the countries’ strategies when it comes to innovation, especially in the permanent evaluation of the results that allow to encourage changes in the execution of innovative activities to maintain their performance over time.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe contributions allow us to understand the dynamics of innovation in the knowledge and creative outputs of countries over time.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe trajectory analysis used in the data analysis is perhaps one of the most robust techniques that makes a time series analysis. This allows identifying trajectories for the independent variables of the study and their influence on the innovation of the country.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-03-2022-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-03-2022-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析2011 - 2021年全球不同国家文化取向(绩效和社会性)对创新投入轨迹及其结果的影响。设计/方法/方法有一种数据分析技术,使用空间贝叶斯模型和灰色预测方法之一。这种技术足以实现调查的目标,因为它允许分析变量如何在时间范围内移动,并允许生成预测。该模型还允许了解是否有泄漏,在一个国家投资可以对地理邻近的国家产生积极影响。所使用的数据库是包含131个国家数据的全球创新指数和包含157个国家2011年至2021年数据的全球项目。分析的变量包括机构、人力资本、研究基础设施、市场成熟度和商业成熟度。另一方面,关于文化取向的缓和,环球计划发展了两个因素:表现取向(高度男性化,避免歧义,权力距离和未来取向)和人道取向(高度女性化,制度和社会集体主义)。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,所有的投入都以不同的速度增长。就机构而言,随着时间的推移产生变化是最困难的。然而,无论国家的文化取向如何,随着时间的推移,人力资本、市场成熟度和商业成熟度是增长最快的。研究的局限性/意义主要的局限性之一是所使用的数据集,因为它只考虑了一种文化方法,尤其是霍夫斯泰德所考虑的方法。然而,其他方法可以帮助评估这项研究的结果。结合已有的研究结果,本研究试图从不同的视角来看待文化变量对世界不同国家企业创新绩效的影响。以同样的方式,评估这些影响允许公司考虑与国家相关的变量,这些变量将影响公司的战略和绩效。实际意义所取得的成果使得有可能加强对国家创新战略的分析,特别是在对结果的永久评价方面,从而鼓励创新活动的执行变化,以保持其长期的绩效。社会影响这些贡献使我们能够了解各国在知识和创造性产出方面的创新动态。数据分析中使用的轨迹分析可能是进行时间序列分析的最稳健的技术之一。这样就可以确定研究中自变量的轨迹及其对国家创新的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of cultural orientations (performance and sociality) on country innovation: a trajectories analysis perspective
Purpose This study aims to analyze the effects of cultural orientations (performance and sociality) on the trajectories of innovation inputs and their results in different countries worldwide between 2011 and 2021. Design/methodology/approach As a technique for data analysis, one of the spatial Bayesian models and Gray forecasting methods is used. This technique is adequate to achieve the objectives of the investigation because it allows analyzing how the variables move in time ranges and allow the generation of forecasts. This model also allows knowing if there are spills, which investing in a country can positively affect countries with geographical proximity. The databases used were the Global Innovation Index with data from 131 nations and the Globe Project with data from 157 countries between 2011 and 2021. The variables analyzed are institutions, human capital, research infrastructure, market sophistication and business sophistication. On the other hand, regarding moderations of cultural orientations, The Globe Project developed two factors: performance orientation (high degree of masculinity, avoidance of ambiguity, power distance and future orientation) and humane orientation (high-level of femininity, institutional and societal collectivism). Findings The results reveal that all inputs grow at different rates over time. In the case of institutions, it is the most difficult to generate changes over time. However, human capital, market sophistication and business sophistication are the ones that have grown the most over time, regardless of the country’s cultural orientation. Research limitations/implications Among the main limitations is the set of data used because it only considers one approach to culture, especially the one considered by Hofstede. However, other approaches could help evaluate the results of this research. Considering the results obtained, the study attempts to provide a different view of the effects of cultural variables on companies’ innovation performance in different countries in the world. In the same way, evaluating these effects allows firms to consider variables associated with the country that will affect the strategies and performance of the firm. Practical implications The results achieved make it possible to strengthen the analysis of the countries’ strategies when it comes to innovation, especially in the permanent evaluation of the results that allow to encourage changes in the execution of innovative activities to maintain their performance over time. Social implications The contributions allow us to understand the dynamics of innovation in the knowledge and creative outputs of countries over time. Originality/value The trajectory analysis used in the data analysis is perhaps one of the most robust techniques that makes a time series analysis. This allows identifying trajectories for the independent variables of the study and their influence on the innovation of the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信