比较工业4.0和工业5.0的演化轨迹:一个管理时尚的视角

IF 3.8 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
D. Madsen, Kåre Slåtten
{"title":"比较工业4.0和工业5.0的演化轨迹:一个管理时尚的视角","authors":"D. Madsen, Kåre Slåtten","doi":"10.3390/asi6020048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Industry 4.0 has received enormous levels of attention since it was introduced in 2011 and continues to be a dominant management trend. However, during the last few years, Industry 5.0 has emerged as an alternative visionary management concept. Although Industry 5.0 builds on and is related to its predecessor, it provides a different vision of the future of industry. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to carry out an in-depth examination of these two related management concepts, using management fashion theory as an interpretive framework and lens. Viewing Industry 4.0 and 5.0 from this vantage point involves analyzing and tracing the involvement activities of the suppliers of the two concepts as well as gauging the concepts’ demand-side impact. Generally, the comparative analysis of the cases of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 indicates that, while the growth and popularity of Industry 4.0 appear to have plateaued, it remains at a high level. Although Industry 5.0 is growing in popularity and is gaining followers and supporters, it is still a much more marginal concept and movement. This study contributes to the management fashion literature by showing how two highly related but competing management concept movements coevolve. Furthermore, the two cases provide novel insights into the trajectories and lifecycles of fashionable management concepts, in particular, the early phase where actors are actively attempting to generate credibility and legitimacy and drum up support and enthusiasm for their preferred ideas.","PeriodicalId":36273,"journal":{"name":"Applied System Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Evolutionary Trajectories of Industry 4.0 and 5.0: A Management Fashion Perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. Madsen, Kåre Slåtten\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/asi6020048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of Industry 4.0 has received enormous levels of attention since it was introduced in 2011 and continues to be a dominant management trend. However, during the last few years, Industry 5.0 has emerged as an alternative visionary management concept. Although Industry 5.0 builds on and is related to its predecessor, it provides a different vision of the future of industry. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to carry out an in-depth examination of these two related management concepts, using management fashion theory as an interpretive framework and lens. Viewing Industry 4.0 and 5.0 from this vantage point involves analyzing and tracing the involvement activities of the suppliers of the two concepts as well as gauging the concepts’ demand-side impact. Generally, the comparative analysis of the cases of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 indicates that, while the growth and popularity of Industry 4.0 appear to have plateaued, it remains at a high level. Although Industry 5.0 is growing in popularity and is gaining followers and supporters, it is still a much more marginal concept and movement. This study contributes to the management fashion literature by showing how two highly related but competing management concept movements coevolve. Furthermore, the two cases provide novel insights into the trajectories and lifecycles of fashionable management concepts, in particular, the early phase where actors are actively attempting to generate credibility and legitimacy and drum up support and enthusiasm for their preferred ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied System Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied System Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6020048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied System Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6020048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2011年引入工业4.0概念以来,它受到了极大的关注,并继续成为主导管理趋势。然而,在过去的几年里,Industry 5.0已经成为一种有远见的管理理念。尽管Industry 5.0建立在其前身的基础上并与其相关,但它对行业的未来提供了不同的愿景。因此,本文的目的是以管理时尚理论为解释框架和视角,对这两个相关的管理概念进行深入的考察。从这个角度来看工业4.0和5.0,包括分析和追踪这两个概念的供应商的参与活动,以及衡量这两个理念的需求侧影响。总体而言,对工业4.0和5.0案例的比较分析表明,虽然工业4.0的增长和普及率似乎已经趋于平稳,但仍处于较高水平。尽管Industry 5.0越来越受欢迎,并获得了追随者和支持者,但它仍然是一个边缘化的概念和运动。本研究通过展示两个高度相关但相互竞争的管理概念运动如何共同发展,为管理时尚文献做出了贡献。此外,这两个案例为时尚管理概念的轨迹和生命周期提供了新的见解,特别是在早期阶段,参与者正积极尝试产生可信度和合法性,并为他们喜欢的想法争取支持和热情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Evolutionary Trajectories of Industry 4.0 and 5.0: A Management Fashion Perspective
The concept of Industry 4.0 has received enormous levels of attention since it was introduced in 2011 and continues to be a dominant management trend. However, during the last few years, Industry 5.0 has emerged as an alternative visionary management concept. Although Industry 5.0 builds on and is related to its predecessor, it provides a different vision of the future of industry. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to carry out an in-depth examination of these two related management concepts, using management fashion theory as an interpretive framework and lens. Viewing Industry 4.0 and 5.0 from this vantage point involves analyzing and tracing the involvement activities of the suppliers of the two concepts as well as gauging the concepts’ demand-side impact. Generally, the comparative analysis of the cases of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 indicates that, while the growth and popularity of Industry 4.0 appear to have plateaued, it remains at a high level. Although Industry 5.0 is growing in popularity and is gaining followers and supporters, it is still a much more marginal concept and movement. This study contributes to the management fashion literature by showing how two highly related but competing management concept movements coevolve. Furthermore, the two cases provide novel insights into the trajectories and lifecycles of fashionable management concepts, in particular, the early phase where actors are actively attempting to generate credibility and legitimacy and drum up support and enthusiasm for their preferred ideas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied System Innovation
Applied System Innovation Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
102
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信