苏联印度学与殖民文献学的批判:阿列克谢·巴兰尼科夫在达利特研究背景下的作品

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 HISTORY
C. Brandist
{"title":"苏联印度学与殖民文献学的批判:阿列克谢·巴兰尼科夫在达利特研究背景下的作品","authors":"C. Brandist","doi":"10.1080/17597536.2022.2116896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The similarities and contacts between early Soviet Indologists and Indian Dalit intellectuals, as regards the critique of Indo-European philology is explored. Attention focuses on A.P. Barannikov’s works of the 1930s and 1940s in which colonial philology is presented as the result of collaboration between colonial and indigenous Brahman intellectuals, which challenges the common conception of such philology as a European imposition in postcolonial studies today. The eclipse of Barannikov’s work in Soviet Indology when, during the Cold War, support for a unitary Indian nationalism was promoted in opposition to Western colonial narratives, is also considered. Consideration of Barannikov’s work in the light of Dalit studies today shows its renewed relevance, and points to ways in which the limitations of some of the rigid dichotomies of Postcolonial Studies can be overcome.","PeriodicalId":41504,"journal":{"name":"Language & History","volume":"65 1","pages":"201 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soviet Indology and the critique of colonial philology: the work of Aleksei Barannikov in the light of Dalit studies\",\"authors\":\"C. Brandist\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17597536.2022.2116896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The similarities and contacts between early Soviet Indologists and Indian Dalit intellectuals, as regards the critique of Indo-European philology is explored. Attention focuses on A.P. Barannikov’s works of the 1930s and 1940s in which colonial philology is presented as the result of collaboration between colonial and indigenous Brahman intellectuals, which challenges the common conception of such philology as a European imposition in postcolonial studies today. The eclipse of Barannikov’s work in Soviet Indology when, during the Cold War, support for a unitary Indian nationalism was promoted in opposition to Western colonial narratives, is also considered. Consideration of Barannikov’s work in the light of Dalit studies today shows its renewed relevance, and points to ways in which the limitations of some of the rigid dichotomies of Postcolonial Studies can be overcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language & History\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language & History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2022.2116896\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2022.2116896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

探讨早期苏联印度学者与印度达利特知识分子在印欧文字学批判方面的相似之处和联系。人们的注意力集中在A.P. Barannikov在20世纪30年代和40年代的作品上,在这些作品中,殖民文献学被呈现为殖民地和土著婆罗门知识分子之间合作的结果,这挑战了将这种文献学视为欧洲在后殖民研究中强加的共同概念。在冷战期间,支持统一的印度民族主义以反对西方殖民主义的叙述,这也被认为是Barannikov在苏联印度学方面的工作黯然失色的原因。从今天达利特研究的角度来考虑巴兰尼科夫的工作,显示了它的新的相关性,并指出了克服后殖民研究中一些僵化的二分法的局限性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soviet Indology and the critique of colonial philology: the work of Aleksei Barannikov in the light of Dalit studies
ABSTRACT The similarities and contacts between early Soviet Indologists and Indian Dalit intellectuals, as regards the critique of Indo-European philology is explored. Attention focuses on A.P. Barannikov’s works of the 1930s and 1940s in which colonial philology is presented as the result of collaboration between colonial and indigenous Brahman intellectuals, which challenges the common conception of such philology as a European imposition in postcolonial studies today. The eclipse of Barannikov’s work in Soviet Indology when, during the Cold War, support for a unitary Indian nationalism was promoted in opposition to Western colonial narratives, is also considered. Consideration of Barannikov’s work in the light of Dalit studies today shows its renewed relevance, and points to ways in which the limitations of some of the rigid dichotomies of Postcolonial Studies can be overcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language & History
Language & History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信