流派弯曲与精神反抗：米娜·帕切特的集中营“食谱”

IF 0.7 4区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Rhetoric Review Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797

Lisa S. Mastrangelo

{"title":"流派弯曲与精神反抗：米娜·帕切特的集中营“食谱”","authors":"Lisa S. Mastrangelo","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This piece examines In Memory’s Kitchen, a collection of recipes, poems, and letters compiled by Mina Pächter in the Terezîn Concentration Camp. The author argues that a proper reading of the text involves understanding genre, acts of resistance, and genre bending. Without applying these complex concepts to the texts, readers are at risk of misreading Pächter’s text as a cookbook rather than a memory text of spiritual resistance.","PeriodicalId":44627,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genre Bending and Spiritual Resistance: Mina Pachter’s Concentration Camp “Cookbook”\",\"authors\":\"Lisa S. Mastrangelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This piece examines In Memory’s Kitchen, a collection of recipes, poems, and letters compiled by Mina Pächter in the Terezîn Concentration Camp. The author argues that a proper reading of the text involves understanding genre, acts of resistance, and genre bending. Without applying these complex concepts to the texts, readers are at risk of misreading Pächter’s text as a cookbook rather than a memory text of spiritual resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.1883797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要这篇文章探讨了米娜·佩切特在Terezîn集中营编纂的食谱、诗歌和信件集《记忆中的厨房》。作者认为，对文本的正确阅读包括理解体裁、抵抗行为和体裁弯曲。如果不将这些复杂的概念应用到文本中，读者就有可能将Pächter的文本误读为一本食谱，而不是一本精神抵抗的记忆文本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Genre Bending and Spiritual Resistance: Mina Pachter’s Concentration Camp “Cookbook”

ABSTRACT This piece examines In Memory’s Kitchen, a collection of recipes, poems, and letters compiled by Mina Pächter in the Terezîn Concentration Camp. The author argues that a proper reading of the text involves understanding genre, acts of resistance, and genre bending. Without applying these complex concepts to the texts, readers are at risk of misreading Pächter’s text as a cookbook rather than a memory text of spiritual resistance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Rhetoric Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Rhetoric Review (RR), a scholarly interdisciplinary journal of rhetoric, publishes in all areas of rhetoric and writing and provides a professional forum for its readers to consider and discuss current topics and issues. The journal publishes manuscripts that explore the breadth and depth of the discipline, including history, theory, writing, praxis, philosophy, professional writing, rhetorical criticism, cultural studies, multiple literacies, technology, literature, public address, graduate education, and professional issues. Rhetoric Review also invites readers to contribute to the Burkean Parlor, a discourse forum for discussion of Rhetoric Review"s published articles, as well as professional issues. Essay reviews, commissioned by the editor, are included as a regular feature.