数学问题解决模块需求分析工具的效度和信度

Q3 Social Sciences
Shivaraj Subramaniam, S. Maat, M. S. Mahmud
{"title":"数学问题解决模块需求分析工具的效度和信度","authors":"Shivaraj Subramaniam, S. Maat, M. S. Mahmud","doi":"10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research’s objective is to investigates the reliability and validity of the needs analysis instrument for mathematics problem-solving based on the computational thinking module among primary school mathematics teachers. For the needs analysis phase, the researchers applied a quantitative method involving a questionnaire. The instrument calibration method is test of language validity, content validity, empirical validity and reliability. The instrument’s reliability was tested in a pilot study involving 50 primary school mathematics teachers. The pilot study was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The pilot test results show that Cronbach’s alpha value for Construct A: computational thinking skills is 0.786, Construct B: problem-solving skills is 0.772, and the need for the problem-solving module is 0.775. Finally, the researcher expects that this instrument will assist other researchers in the needs analysis phase of developing a mathematical module based on computational thinking in problem-solving.\nKeywords: Validity, reliability, mathematics, module, computational","PeriodicalId":37121,"journal":{"name":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the needs analysis instrument for the mathematics problem-solving module\",\"authors\":\"Shivaraj Subramaniam, S. Maat, M. S. Mahmud\",\"doi\":\"10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research’s objective is to investigates the reliability and validity of the needs analysis instrument for mathematics problem-solving based on the computational thinking module among primary school mathematics teachers. For the needs analysis phase, the researchers applied a quantitative method involving a questionnaire. The instrument calibration method is test of language validity, content validity, empirical validity and reliability. The instrument’s reliability was tested in a pilot study involving 50 primary school mathematics teachers. The pilot study was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The pilot test results show that Cronbach’s alpha value for Construct A: computational thinking skills is 0.786, Construct B: problem-solving skills is 0.772, and the need for the problem-solving module is 0.775. Finally, the researcher expects that this instrument will assist other researchers in the needs analysis phase of developing a mathematical module based on computational thinking in problem-solving.\\nKeywords: Validity, reliability, mathematics, module, computational\",\"PeriodicalId\":37121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在小学数学教师中调查基于计算思维模块的数学问题解决需求分析工具的可靠性和有效性。在需求分析阶段,研究人员采用了包括问卷在内的定量方法。仪器校准方法是对语言有效性、内容有效性、经验有效性和可靠性进行测试。该仪器的可靠性在一项涉及50名小学数学教师的试点研究中进行了测试。使用SPSS版本26对试点研究进行分析。初步测试结果显示,结构A:计算思维技能的Cronbachα值为0.786,结构B:解决问题的技能为0.772,对解决问题模块的需求为0.775。最后,研究人员希望该仪器将在需求分析阶段帮助其他研究人员开发基于问题解决中计算思维的数学模块。关键词:有效性、可靠性、数学、模块、计算
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of the needs analysis instrument for the mathematics problem-solving module
This research’s objective is to investigates the reliability and validity of the needs analysis instrument for mathematics problem-solving based on the computational thinking module among primary school mathematics teachers. For the needs analysis phase, the researchers applied a quantitative method involving a questionnaire. The instrument calibration method is test of language validity, content validity, empirical validity and reliability. The instrument’s reliability was tested in a pilot study involving 50 primary school mathematics teachers. The pilot study was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The pilot test results show that Cronbach’s alpha value for Construct A: computational thinking skills is 0.786, Construct B: problem-solving skills is 0.772, and the need for the problem-solving module is 0.775. Finally, the researcher expects that this instrument will assist other researchers in the needs analysis phase of developing a mathematical module based on computational thinking in problem-solving. Keywords: Validity, reliability, mathematics, module, computational
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信