印度尼西亚水果和蔬菜中的农药残留:五年能力测试的结果

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Mariska M. Pitoi, Harmoko Harmoko, Astika Tresnawati, Hilman F. Pardede, Miranti Ariyani, Yohanes S. Ridwan, Retno Yusiasih
{"title":"印度尼西亚水果和蔬菜中的农药残留:五年能力测试的结果","authors":"Mariska M. Pitoi,&nbsp;Harmoko Harmoko,&nbsp;Astika Tresnawati,&nbsp;Hilman F. Pardede,&nbsp;Miranti Ariyani,&nbsp;Yohanes S. Ridwan,&nbsp;Retno Yusiasih","doi":"10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first proficiency testing of pesticides in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia is reported. This report covers the findings of five-year proficiency testings. Every year, from 2016 to 2020, 18–25 laboratories join the proficiency testings and analyze 5–11 pesticides in tomato, orange, lettuce, brown rice, strawberry respectively. The number of laboratories participating in the proficiency testings tends to increase, although only 38 % of the laboratories are able to report all pesticides. More than 72 % of participants use QuEChERS or its modifications for sample preparation, all participants use gas chromatography or liquid chromatography for separation, at least 20 % of participants still rely on detectors other than mass spectrophotometer for detection, and 20 %–60 % of participants use matrix-matched calibration for quantification. The performance of laboratories is evaluated as <i>z</i>-score with an average of 90.8 % achieves satisfactory results while 3.3 % and 5.9 % achieve questionable and unsatisfactory results correspondingly. Overall, the performance of laboratory participants during proficiency testings is good. However, improvement is still needed, especially for the number of target pesticides for multi-residue pesticide analysis. Moreover, unsatisfactory <i>z</i>-scores are likely to be resulted from laboratories which use conventional solvent extraction, use detectors other than mass spectrometers, and are not accredited.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"27 4","pages":"181 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia: findings of five-year proficiency testing\",\"authors\":\"Mariska M. Pitoi,&nbsp;Harmoko Harmoko,&nbsp;Astika Tresnawati,&nbsp;Hilman F. Pardede,&nbsp;Miranti Ariyani,&nbsp;Yohanes S. Ridwan,&nbsp;Retno Yusiasih\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The first proficiency testing of pesticides in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia is reported. This report covers the findings of five-year proficiency testings. Every year, from 2016 to 2020, 18–25 laboratories join the proficiency testings and analyze 5–11 pesticides in tomato, orange, lettuce, brown rice, strawberry respectively. The number of laboratories participating in the proficiency testings tends to increase, although only 38 % of the laboratories are able to report all pesticides. More than 72 % of participants use QuEChERS or its modifications for sample preparation, all participants use gas chromatography or liquid chromatography for separation, at least 20 % of participants still rely on detectors other than mass spectrophotometer for detection, and 20 %–60 % of participants use matrix-matched calibration for quantification. The performance of laboratories is evaluated as <i>z</i>-score with an average of 90.8 % achieves satisfactory results while 3.3 % and 5.9 % achieve questionable and unsatisfactory results correspondingly. Overall, the performance of laboratory participants during proficiency testings is good. However, improvement is still needed, especially for the number of target pesticides for multi-residue pesticide analysis. Moreover, unsatisfactory <i>z</i>-scores are likely to be resulted from laboratories which use conventional solvent extraction, use detectors other than mass spectrometers, and are not accredited.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"181 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-022-01502-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

据报道,印度尼西亚首次对水果和蔬菜中的农药进行了熟练程度测试。这份报告涵盖了五年能力测试的结果。从2016年到2020年,每年有18-25个实验室参加能力测试,分别对番茄、橙子、生菜、糙米、草莓中的5-11种农药进行分析。尽管只有38%的实验室能够报告所有农药,但参与能力测试的实验室数量趋于增加。超过72%的参与者使用QuEChERS或其修改版本进行样品制备,所有参与者使用气相色谱法或液相色谱法进行分离,至少20%的参与者仍然依赖于质谱仪以外的检测器进行检测,20% - 60%的参与者使用基质匹配校准进行定量。实验室绩效以z分数评价,平均90.8%达到满意结果,3.3%和5.9%分别达到可疑和不满意结果。总体而言,实验室参与者在能力测试中的表现良好。但是,对于多残留农药分析,在目标农药数量方面还有待改进。此外,不令人满意的z分数很可能是由于实验室使用传统的溶剂萃取,使用检测器而不是质谱仪,并且没有得到认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia: findings of five-year proficiency testing

The first proficiency testing of pesticides in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia is reported. This report covers the findings of five-year proficiency testings. Every year, from 2016 to 2020, 18–25 laboratories join the proficiency testings and analyze 5–11 pesticides in tomato, orange, lettuce, brown rice, strawberry respectively. The number of laboratories participating in the proficiency testings tends to increase, although only 38 % of the laboratories are able to report all pesticides. More than 72 % of participants use QuEChERS or its modifications for sample preparation, all participants use gas chromatography or liquid chromatography for separation, at least 20 % of participants still rely on detectors other than mass spectrophotometer for detection, and 20 %–60 % of participants use matrix-matched calibration for quantification. The performance of laboratories is evaluated as z-score with an average of 90.8 % achieves satisfactory results while 3.3 % and 5.9 % achieve questionable and unsatisfactory results correspondingly. Overall, the performance of laboratory participants during proficiency testings is good. However, improvement is still needed, especially for the number of target pesticides for multi-residue pesticide analysis. Moreover, unsatisfactory z-scores are likely to be resulted from laboratories which use conventional solvent extraction, use detectors other than mass spectrometers, and are not accredited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信