组织心理学/组织行为学的实践者-科学家视角

IF 14.3 1区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2019-01-21 DOI:10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323

G. Latham

{"title":"组织心理学/组织行为学的实践者-科学家视角","authors":"G. Latham","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I comment on areas where I agree/disagree with the five previous perspectives on organizational psychology/organizational behavior (OP/OB). This is followed by a dire prediction of the future for OP doctoral programs, criticisms of the journal editorial processes and the overemphasis on deductive theory building, the value of qualitative analyses and enumerative reviews, the importance of mentors for advancing one's career, and the strengths and weaknesses of our scholarly societies. The article ends with a call for improving the balance currently in favor of scientists at the expense of practitioners.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of a Practitioner-Scientist on Organizational Psychology/Organizational Behavior\",\"authors\":\"G. Latham\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I comment on areas where I agree/disagree with the five previous perspectives on organizational psychology/organizational behavior (OP/OB). This is followed by a dire prediction of the future for OP doctoral programs, criticisms of the journal editorial processes and the overemphasis on deductive theory building, the value of qualitative analyses and enumerative reviews, the importance of mentors for advancing one's career, and the strengths and weaknesses of our scholarly societies. The article ends with a call for improving the balance currently in favor of scientists at the expense of practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

在这篇文章中，我评论了我同意/不同意之前关于组织心理学/组织行为学(OP/OB)的五个观点的领域。接下来是对OP博士项目未来的可怕预测，对期刊编辑过程和过分强调演绎理论建设的批评，定性分析和枚举评论的价值，导师对个人职业发展的重要性，以及我们学术团体的优势和劣势。文章最后呼吁改善目前有利于科学家而牺牲实践者的平衡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Perspectives of a Practitioner-Scientist on Organizational Psychology/Organizational Behavior

In this article I comment on areas where I agree/disagree with the five previous perspectives on organizational psychology/organizational behavior (OP/OB). This is followed by a dire prediction of the future for OP doctoral programs, criticisms of the journal editorial processes and the overemphasis on deductive theory building, the value of qualitative analyses and enumerative reviews, the importance of mentors for advancing one's career, and the strengths and weaknesses of our scholarly societies. The article ends with a call for improving the balance currently in favor of scientists at the expense of practitioners.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

24.20

自引率

2.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Launched in March 2014, the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is a publication dedicated to reviewing the literature on I/O Psychology and HRM/OB. In the latest edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2023, this journal achieved significant recognition. It ranked among the top 5 journals in two categories and boasted an impressive Impact Factor of 13.7.