{"title":"最高法院2021年11月17日的裁决，V KK 384/21","authors":"Szymon Krajnik","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.9-s.krajnik","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The gloss on the Supreme Court ruling of 17 November 2021, V KK 384/21, presents opinions about the objective recognition of the result of the act of causing the so-called serious traffic accident resulting from inappropriate fastening of seat belts by a passenger. Approving of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the author of the gloss extends its justification, especially from the perspective of the concept of the objective recognition of a result and in the light of the rules of functional interpretation of law.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"164 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gloss on the Supreme Court Ruling of 17 November 2021, V KK 384/21\",\"authors\":\"Szymon Krajnik\",\"doi\":\"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.9-s.krajnik\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The gloss on the Supreme Court ruling of 17 November 2021, V KK 384/21, presents opinions about the objective recognition of the result of the act of causing the so-called serious traffic accident resulting from inappropriate fastening of seat belts by a passenger. Approving of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the author of the gloss extends its justification, especially from the perspective of the concept of the objective recognition of a result and in the light of the rules of functional interpretation of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Novum\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Novum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.9-s.krajnik\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.9-s.krajnik","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要最高法院2021年11月17日的裁决，V KK 384/21，就客观承认因乘客系安全带不当导致所谓严重交通事故的行为结果提出了意见。该书的作者赞同最高法院的裁决，特别是从客观承认结果的概念和法律功能解释规则的角度，扩展了其正当性。
Gloss on the Supreme Court Ruling of 17 November 2021, V KK 384/21
Summary The gloss on the Supreme Court ruling of 17 November 2021, V KK 384/21, presents opinions about the objective recognition of the result of the act of causing the so-called serious traffic accident resulting from inappropriate fastening of seat belts by a passenger. Approving of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the author of the gloss extends its justification, especially from the perspective of the concept of the objective recognition of a result and in the light of the rules of functional interpretation of law.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
