(后-)保罗,从长远来看?

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
J. Punt
{"title":"(后-)保罗,从长远来看?","authors":"J. Punt","doi":"10.1353/NEO.2020.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:“Perspectives” such as the “New Perspective” or the “Radical New Perspective” on Paul, to name two prominent versions, have come to characterise much of Pauline research since the late twentieth century. This article explores the settings of and reasons for the particular “perspectival” focus on the Pauline letters, its ensuing legacies, and subsequent impact on Pauline studies. Hermeneutical approaches such as perspectives in Pauline scholarship are more than simply heuristic approaches, so that their wider significance and effects deserve attention. Reflections on (some of) the effects and impact of such multifaceted approaches on Pauline scholarship, amidst a plethora of juxtaposed methodological approaches where primary perspectival leanings often linger, conclude the article.","PeriodicalId":42126,"journal":{"name":"Neotestamentica","volume":"54 1","pages":"373 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/NEO.2020.0023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Post-)Perspectivally, Paul?\",\"authors\":\"J. Punt\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/NEO.2020.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:“Perspectives” such as the “New Perspective” or the “Radical New Perspective” on Paul, to name two prominent versions, have come to characterise much of Pauline research since the late twentieth century. This article explores the settings of and reasons for the particular “perspectival” focus on the Pauline letters, its ensuing legacies, and subsequent impact on Pauline studies. Hermeneutical approaches such as perspectives in Pauline scholarship are more than simply heuristic approaches, so that their wider significance and effects deserve attention. Reflections on (some of) the effects and impact of such multifaceted approaches on Pauline scholarship, amidst a plethora of juxtaposed methodological approaches where primary perspectival leanings often linger, conclude the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"373 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/NEO.2020.0023\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/NEO.2020.0023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotestamentica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/NEO.2020.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:“视角”,如对保罗的“新视角”或“激进的新视角”,举两个突出的版本,自20世纪末以来,已经成为波林研究的特征。本文探讨了对波林书信的特殊“透视”关注的背景和原因,及其随之而来的遗产,以及对波林研究的后续影响。解释学方法,如波林学术中的视角,不仅仅是启发式方法,因此其更广泛的意义和效果值得关注。文章总结道,在大量并置的方法论方法中,主要的视角倾向往往挥之不去,反思这些多方面方法对波林学术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Post-)Perspectivally, Paul?
Abstract:“Perspectives” such as the “New Perspective” or the “Radical New Perspective” on Paul, to name two prominent versions, have come to characterise much of Pauline research since the late twentieth century. This article explores the settings of and reasons for the particular “perspectival” focus on the Pauline letters, its ensuing legacies, and subsequent impact on Pauline studies. Hermeneutical approaches such as perspectives in Pauline scholarship are more than simply heuristic approaches, so that their wider significance and effects deserve attention. Reflections on (some of) the effects and impact of such multifaceted approaches on Pauline scholarship, amidst a plethora of juxtaposed methodological approaches where primary perspectival leanings often linger, conclude the article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neotestamentica
Neotestamentica RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信