焦点穷尽性与对比主题的反穷尽性

IF 0.6 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Theoretical Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1515/tl-2020-0007

Satoshi Tomioka

{"title":"焦点穷尽性与对比主题的反穷尽性","authors":"Satoshi Tomioka","doi":"10.1515/tl-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.","PeriodicalId":46148,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Linguistics","volume":"46 1","pages":"123 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tl-2020-0007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exhaustivity of focus and anti-exhaustivity of contrastive topic\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Tomioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

贯穿本评论的主要概念是与焦点相关的穷尽性。尽管这个问题不是作者分析的核心，但我相信它会引发一些有趣和令人困惑的问题，值得考虑。在4.3中的讨论中，Kamali和Krifka（以下简称K&K）通过使用否定的言语行为版本“去约束”的概念来分析焦点穷尽性。非正式地说，对言论行为的抑制a是对参与a的抑制。我不清楚的是，抑制是否足够强大，以保证焦点的穷尽效应。为了说明这一点，我们来比较两种聚焦策略：聚焦和对比主题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Exhaustivity of focus and anti-exhaustivity of contrastive topic

Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Theoretical Linguistics Multiple-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.