制度选择、风险与控制:萨赫勒五国集团与萨赫勒地区的冲突管理

IF 1.5 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Martin Welz
{"title":"制度选择、风险与控制:萨赫勒五国集团与萨赫勒地区的冲突管理","authors":"Martin Welz","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2022.2031993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using institutional choice theory, this article seeks to explain why the G5 Sahel, an international organization that comprises Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger, was created in 2014 and tasked to deal with conflict management in the Sahel through its Joint Force that was established in 2017. While the use of the theory offers crucial insights into the creation of the G5 Sahel, I also find that the theory overestimates the costs and risks attached to the creation of a new institution while underestimating the desire of states to maintain control over actions on the ground – at least when it comes to security questions.","PeriodicalId":47231,"journal":{"name":"International Peacekeeping","volume":"29 1","pages":"235 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Choice, Risk, and Control: The G5 Sahel and Conflict Management in the Sahel\",\"authors\":\"Martin Welz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13533312.2022.2031993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Using institutional choice theory, this article seeks to explain why the G5 Sahel, an international organization that comprises Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger, was created in 2014 and tasked to deal with conflict management in the Sahel through its Joint Force that was established in 2017. While the use of the theory offers crucial insights into the creation of the G5 Sahel, I also find that the theory overestimates the costs and risks attached to the creation of a new institution while underestimating the desire of states to maintain control over actions on the ground – at least when it comes to security questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Peacekeeping\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Peacekeeping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2031993\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2031993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

运用制度选择理论,本文试图解释为什么萨赫勒五国集团(G5 Sahel)是一个由布基纳法索、乍得、马里、毛里塔尼亚和尼日尔组成的国际组织,于2014年成立,并通过2017年成立的联合部队负责处理萨赫勒地区的冲突管理。虽然该理论的运用为萨赫勒五国集团的创建提供了至关重要的见解,但我也发现,该理论高估了创建一个新机构所附带的成本和风险,同时低估了各国保持对实地行动控制的愿望——至少在涉及安全问题时是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional Choice, Risk, and Control: The G5 Sahel and Conflict Management in the Sahel
ABSTRACT Using institutional choice theory, this article seeks to explain why the G5 Sahel, an international organization that comprises Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger, was created in 2014 and tasked to deal with conflict management in the Sahel through its Joint Force that was established in 2017. While the use of the theory offers crucial insights into the creation of the G5 Sahel, I also find that the theory overestimates the costs and risks attached to the creation of a new institution while underestimating the desire of states to maintain control over actions on the ground – at least when it comes to security questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Peacekeeping
International Peacekeeping INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.40%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信