遗产中确定性、利益和公正性的实施

Mohammad Yusuf Hr, Choirul Anam
{"title":"遗产中确定性、利益和公正性的实施","authors":"Mohammad Yusuf Hr, Choirul Anam","doi":"10.17977/UM019V6I1P274-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to describe inheritance disputes and the fulfillment of aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003. This study used a normative legal method by conceptualizing a statutory regulation. This study was a qualitative descriptive study because it aimed to describe the Decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 systematically and accurately. Inheritance disputes in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 were acts that aimed at controlling the inheritance without the knowledge of the heirs. The decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg did not reflect the aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice. It did not pay attention to and considered Law Number 1 of 1974, the provisions of Article 118 paragraph (1) Herzien Inlandsch Reglement, and evidence from the defendants. The Supreme Court’s decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 reflected the aspects of certainty, benefit, and legal justice because it has taken into account and considered the facts and evidence in the trial in the form of a certificate from the inheritance hall as well as a copy of the Decree of the Religious Court Number 4026/1985.","PeriodicalId":31344,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pemenuhan Aspek Kepastian, Kemanfaatan, dan Keadilan Hukum dalam Sengketa Waris\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Yusuf Hr, Choirul Anam\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/UM019V6I1P274-281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to describe inheritance disputes and the fulfillment of aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003. This study used a normative legal method by conceptualizing a statutory regulation. This study was a qualitative descriptive study because it aimed to describe the Decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 systematically and accurately. Inheritance disputes in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 were acts that aimed at controlling the inheritance without the knowledge of the heirs. The decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg did not reflect the aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice. It did not pay attention to and considered Law Number 1 of 1974, the provisions of Article 118 paragraph (1) Herzien Inlandsch Reglement, and evidence from the defendants. The Supreme Court’s decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 reflected the aspects of certainty, benefit, and legal justice because it has taken into account and considered the facts and evidence in the trial in the form of a certificate from the inheritance hall as well as a copy of the Decree of the Religious Court Number 4026/1985.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM019V6I1P274-281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM019V6I1P274-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在描述地区法院第203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg号裁决和最高法院第2332K/Pdt/2003号裁决中的继承纠纷以及确定性、实用性和法律公正性方面的实现。本研究采用了规范性法律方法,对法定法规进行了概念化。本研究是一项定性描述性研究,因为它旨在系统准确地描述地区法院第203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg号裁决和最高法院第2332K/Pdt/2003号裁决。地方法院第203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg号裁决和最高法院第2332K/Pdt/2003号裁决中的继承纠纷是旨在在继承人不知情的情况下控制继承的行为。第203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg号地方法院的裁决没有反映确定性、实用性和法律公正性等方面。它没有注意和考虑1974年第1号法律、第118条第(1)款的规定以及被告提供的证据。最高法院第2332K/Pdt/2003号裁决反映了确定性、利益和法律公正的各个方面,因为它考虑并考虑了审判中的事实和证据,包括遗产大厅的证书以及第4026/1985号宗教法院法令的副本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pemenuhan Aspek Kepastian, Kemanfaatan, dan Keadilan Hukum dalam Sengketa Waris
This study aimed to describe inheritance disputes and the fulfillment of aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003. This study used a normative legal method by conceptualizing a statutory regulation. This study was a qualitative descriptive study because it aimed to describe the Decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 systematically and accurately. Inheritance disputes in the District Court Decision Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 were acts that aimed at controlling the inheritance without the knowledge of the heirs. The decision of the District Court Number 203/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Mlg did not reflect the aspects of certainty, utility, and legal justice. It did not pay attention to and considered Law Number 1 of 1974, the provisions of Article 118 paragraph (1) Herzien Inlandsch Reglement, and evidence from the defendants. The Supreme Court’s decision Number 2332K/Pdt/2003 reflected the aspects of certainty, benefit, and legal justice because it has taken into account and considered the facts and evidence in the trial in the form of a certificate from the inheritance hall as well as a copy of the Decree of the Religious Court Number 4026/1985.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信