应用Macintosh喉镜和Airtraq评估甲状腺手术后声带活动度的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
A. Ramzi, A. Nileshwar, L. Shenoy, Siri Kandavar
{"title":"应用Macintosh喉镜和Airtraq评估甲状腺手术后声带活动度的比较","authors":"A. Ramzi, A. Nileshwar, L. Shenoy, Siri Kandavar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-11010-05205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vocal cord assessment after thyroidectomy, routinely performed by anaesthesiologist by direct laryngoscopy in the immediate postoperative period is associated with significant haemodynamic changes and patient discomfort. Aim: Comparison of patient comfort, haemodynamic response and accuracy of assessment of vocal cord mobility between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Methodology: In a prospective, randomised controlled study, 82 euthyroid patients, ASA PS 1-2, aged 20-60 years, of either gender undergoing thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomised to one of two groups, Group M and Group A. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl, maintained with morphine, vecuronium, nitrous oxide and isoflurane in oxygen to maintain a MAC of 1-1.3%. At the end of surgery, patients were extubated after complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade and when fully awake. Vocal cord movement and haemodynamic changes were assessed three minutes later using either Airtraq (Group A) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Group M). Patient reactivity score (Favourable - No grimace or facial grimace; Unfavourable – Any head, neck and limb movements or cough). Vocal cord movements were again assessed by an ENT surgeon 48 hours later. Results: Demographic data, type and duration of surgery were similar in both groups. 63.4% of patients in Group A had favourable scores compared to 29.3% in Group M even though duration of laryngoscopy was longer in Group A. There was no significant difference in haemodynamic changes between the groups. Conclusion: Patients are more comfortable during vocal cord assessment with Airtraq laryngoscopy even though duration of laryngoscopy is longer when compared to Macintosh laryngoscope.","PeriodicalId":53846,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of assessment of vocal cord mobility following thyroid surgery using Macintosh Laryngoscope and Airtraq\",\"authors\":\"A. Ramzi, A. Nileshwar, L. Shenoy, Siri Kandavar\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-11010-05205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Vocal cord assessment after thyroidectomy, routinely performed by anaesthesiologist by direct laryngoscopy in the immediate postoperative period is associated with significant haemodynamic changes and patient discomfort. Aim: Comparison of patient comfort, haemodynamic response and accuracy of assessment of vocal cord mobility between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Methodology: In a prospective, randomised controlled study, 82 euthyroid patients, ASA PS 1-2, aged 20-60 years, of either gender undergoing thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomised to one of two groups, Group M and Group A. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl, maintained with morphine, vecuronium, nitrous oxide and isoflurane in oxygen to maintain a MAC of 1-1.3%. At the end of surgery, patients were extubated after complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade and when fully awake. Vocal cord movement and haemodynamic changes were assessed three minutes later using either Airtraq (Group A) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Group M). Patient reactivity score (Favourable - No grimace or facial grimace; Unfavourable – Any head, neck and limb movements or cough). Vocal cord movements were again assessed by an ENT surgeon 48 hours later. Results: Demographic data, type and duration of surgery were similar in both groups. 63.4% of patients in Group A had favourable scores compared to 29.3% in Group M even though duration of laryngoscopy was longer in Group A. There was no significant difference in haemodynamic changes between the groups. Conclusion: Patients are more comfortable during vocal cord assessment with Airtraq laryngoscopy even though duration of laryngoscopy is longer when compared to Macintosh laryngoscope.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11010-05205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11010-05205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:甲状腺切除术后的声带评估,通常由麻醉师在术后直接喉镜下进行,与明显的血流动力学改变和患者不适有关。目的:比较Airtraq喉镜与Macintosh喉镜对患者舒适度、血流动力学反应及声带活动度评估的准确性。方法:在一项前瞻性随机对照研究中,82例ASA PS 1-2,年龄20-60岁,任意性别的甲状腺功能正常患者在全麻下接受甲状腺切除术,随机分为M组和a组。麻醉由异丙酚和芬太尼诱导,吗啡、维库溴铵、氧化亚氮和异氟烷氧维持,以维持1-1.3%的MAC。手术结束时,患者在神经肌肉阻断完全逆转并完全清醒时拔管。三分钟后使用Airtraq (A组)或Macintosh喉镜(M组)评估声带运动和血流动力学变化。患者反应性评分(有利-无鬼脸或面部鬼脸;不利-任何头部,颈部和四肢运动或咳嗽)。48小时后耳鼻喉外科医生再次评估声带运动。结果:两组患者的人口学资料、手术类型和手术时间相似。尽管A组喉镜检查时间较长,但A组63.4%的患者得分较好,而M组为29.3%。两组之间血流动力学变化无显著差异。结论:与Macintosh喉镜相比,Airtraq喉镜检查时间更长,但患者在声带评估时更舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of assessment of vocal cord mobility following thyroid surgery using Macintosh Laryngoscope and Airtraq
Introduction: Vocal cord assessment after thyroidectomy, routinely performed by anaesthesiologist by direct laryngoscopy in the immediate postoperative period is associated with significant haemodynamic changes and patient discomfort. Aim: Comparison of patient comfort, haemodynamic response and accuracy of assessment of vocal cord mobility between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Methodology: In a prospective, randomised controlled study, 82 euthyroid patients, ASA PS 1-2, aged 20-60 years, of either gender undergoing thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomised to one of two groups, Group M and Group A. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl, maintained with morphine, vecuronium, nitrous oxide and isoflurane in oxygen to maintain a MAC of 1-1.3%. At the end of surgery, patients were extubated after complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade and when fully awake. Vocal cord movement and haemodynamic changes were assessed three minutes later using either Airtraq (Group A) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Group M). Patient reactivity score (Favourable - No grimace or facial grimace; Unfavourable – Any head, neck and limb movements or cough). Vocal cord movements were again assessed by an ENT surgeon 48 hours later. Results: Demographic data, type and duration of surgery were similar in both groups. 63.4% of patients in Group A had favourable scores compared to 29.3% in Group M even though duration of laryngoscopy was longer in Group A. There was no significant difference in haemodynamic changes between the groups. Conclusion: Patients are more comfortable during vocal cord assessment with Airtraq laryngoscopy even though duration of laryngoscopy is longer when compared to Macintosh laryngoscope.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信