可持续发展与“绿色”理念

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Grand, V. D´Elia
{"title":"可持续发展与“绿色”理念","authors":"M. Grand, V. D´Elia","doi":"10.22201/IIEC.20078951E.2018.192.59312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the financial crisis that broke out in 2008, new terms to talk about sustainable development started to emerge: the “green” economy and “green” growth. Some countries supported their usage and others did not. The literature witnessed the recrudescence of the debate on the relationship between economic activity and taking care of the environment, divided into three stances: degrowth advocates, “green” growth backers, and the growth agnostics. This paper dives into the different “green” terms, paying special attention to the case of Argentina. Unlike in previous papers, which have analyzed country interventions in international forums, the methodology here was to search the web pages of the most relevant local players. The most traditional terms “sustainable development” were strongly predominant, and the concepts of “green” economy or “green” growth were few and far between.","PeriodicalId":35889,"journal":{"name":"Problemas del Desarrollo","volume":"49 1","pages":"61-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desarrollo sostenible y conceptos “verdes”\",\"authors\":\"M. Grand, V. D´Elia\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIEC.20078951E.2018.192.59312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the aftermath of the financial crisis that broke out in 2008, new terms to talk about sustainable development started to emerge: the “green” economy and “green” growth. Some countries supported their usage and others did not. The literature witnessed the recrudescence of the debate on the relationship between economic activity and taking care of the environment, divided into three stances: degrowth advocates, “green” growth backers, and the growth agnostics. This paper dives into the different “green” terms, paying special attention to the case of Argentina. Unlike in previous papers, which have analyzed country interventions in international forums, the methodology here was to search the web pages of the most relevant local players. The most traditional terms “sustainable development” were strongly predominant, and the concepts of “green” economy or “green” growth were few and far between.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemas del Desarrollo\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"61-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemas del Desarrollo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIEC.20078951E.2018.192.59312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemas del Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIEC.20078951E.2018.192.59312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

2008年爆发的金融危机之后,关于可持续发展的新术语开始出现:“绿色”经济和“绿色”增长。有些国家支持使用,有些国家则不支持。这些文献见证了关于经济活动与环境保护之间关系的辩论再次出现,分为三种立场:反增长倡导者、“绿色”增长支持者和增长不可知论者。本文深入探讨了不同的“绿色”术语,并特别关注了阿根廷的案例。与以前的论文分析了国家在国际论坛上的干预不同,本文的方法是搜索最相关的当地参与者的网页。“可持续发展”是最传统的用语,占主导地位,“绿色”经济或“绿色”增长的概念很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desarrollo sostenible y conceptos “verdes”
In the aftermath of the financial crisis that broke out in 2008, new terms to talk about sustainable development started to emerge: the “green” economy and “green” growth. Some countries supported their usage and others did not. The literature witnessed the recrudescence of the debate on the relationship between economic activity and taking care of the environment, divided into three stances: degrowth advocates, “green” growth backers, and the growth agnostics. This paper dives into the different “green” terms, paying special attention to the case of Argentina. Unlike in previous papers, which have analyzed country interventions in international forums, the methodology here was to search the web pages of the most relevant local players. The most traditional terms “sustainable development” were strongly predominant, and the concepts of “green” economy or “green” growth were few and far between.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problemas del Desarrollo
Problemas del Desarrollo Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: roblemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, publicación trimestral, es el órgano oficial de divulgación del Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), el que atento a la propuesta de sus fundadores, recibe todas las interpretaciones teóricas que con rigor científico, pretendan analizar las diferentes dificultades planteadas por el desarrollo económico, a fin de generar crítica, refutación y reconocer desacuerdos entre predicciones como cualquier teoría científica es capaz de hacerlo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信