海上殖民:笛福《鲁滨逊漂流记》中的海洋贸易与旅行

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephen Fragano
{"title":"海上殖民:笛福《鲁滨逊漂流记》中的海洋贸易与旅行","authors":"Stephen Fragano","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Scholars of Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe have identified terrestrial concepts like land enclosure as keys to understanding Crusoe's colonial practices. Building on the field of oceanic humanities, however, I argue that Crusoe's claim to the island derives from his understanding of the sea as open to possession. Specifically, this article argues that Crusoe uses the island's distance from European maritime routes to mark it a claimable space outside European sovereignty. He also appropriates indigenous seafaring knowledge and maritime networks before converting the island into his own overseas colony by plying imperial routes of traffic and trade.","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonizing Land by Sea: Oceanic Trade and Travel in Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Fragano\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecs.2023.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Scholars of Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe have identified terrestrial concepts like land enclosure as keys to understanding Crusoe's colonial practices. Building on the field of oceanic humanities, however, I argue that Crusoe's claim to the island derives from his understanding of the sea as open to possession. Specifically, this article argues that Crusoe uses the island's distance from European maritime routes to mark it a claimable space outside European sovereignty. He also appropriates indigenous seafaring knowledge and maritime networks before converting the island into his own overseas colony by plying imperial routes of traffic and trade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:笛福的《鲁滨逊漂流记》研究学者认为,土地圈地等陆地概念是理解鲁滨逊殖民行为的关键。然而,在海洋人文学科的基础上,我认为克鲁索对该岛的主张源于他对海洋是开放的占有的理解。具体而言,本文认为克鲁索利用该岛与欧洲海上航线的距离,将其标记为欧洲主权之外的可主张空间。他还利用了当地的航海知识和海上网络,然后通过帝国的交通和贸易路线将该岛变成了自己的海外殖民地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonizing Land by Sea: Oceanic Trade and Travel in Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe
Abstract:Scholars of Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe have identified terrestrial concepts like land enclosure as keys to understanding Crusoe's colonial practices. Building on the field of oceanic humanities, however, I argue that Crusoe's claim to the island derives from his understanding of the sea as open to possession. Specifically, this article argues that Crusoe uses the island's distance from European maritime routes to mark it a claimable space outside European sovereignty. He also appropriates indigenous seafaring knowledge and maritime networks before converting the island into his own overseas colony by plying imperial routes of traffic and trade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信