禽舍在不同蒸发冷却系统下的性能评价

S. Abdel-Rahman
{"title":"禽舍在不同蒸发冷却系统下的性能评价","authors":"S. Abdel-Rahman","doi":"10.21608/zjar.2020.110328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poultry production occupied a major role in the agriculture industry worldwide. Poultry housing design plays a vital role in determination of the internal climatic conditions for optimum health, growth and productive performance of the poultries. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the performance of different evaporative cooling systems with environmental control of poultry houses. The effect of two different evaporative cooling systems (direct and indirect) under three water flow rates of 2, 4 and 6 l/min.m on poultry houses performance was evaluated in terms of temperature reduction, relative humidity, evaporative cooling efficiency, poultry weight, consumed energy and cost. Experimental results revealed that using direct evaporative cooling system with 4 l/min.m water flow rate and indirect evaporative cooling system with 2 l/min.m water flow rate provided sufficient conditions of temperature reduction (9.59 and 7.28C), relative humidity (63.88 and 61.21%), cooling efficiency (75.67 and 83.67 %), poultry weight (2.4 and 2.3 kg) and consumed energy (1.2 and 6 kW.day) with net return (7.54 and 5.80 LE/kg), in that order. Based on previously mentioned results, it is recommended to use direct evaporative cooling system for poultry houses as it minimizes both energy and cost requirements compared to the indirect evaporative cooling system, therefore it was found to be suitable for small rural farmers.","PeriodicalId":14975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"47 1","pages":"999-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF POULTRY HOUSES UNDER DIFFERENT EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEMS\",\"authors\":\"S. Abdel-Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/zjar.2020.110328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Poultry production occupied a major role in the agriculture industry worldwide. Poultry housing design plays a vital role in determination of the internal climatic conditions for optimum health, growth and productive performance of the poultries. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the performance of different evaporative cooling systems with environmental control of poultry houses. The effect of two different evaporative cooling systems (direct and indirect) under three water flow rates of 2, 4 and 6 l/min.m on poultry houses performance was evaluated in terms of temperature reduction, relative humidity, evaporative cooling efficiency, poultry weight, consumed energy and cost. Experimental results revealed that using direct evaporative cooling system with 4 l/min.m water flow rate and indirect evaporative cooling system with 2 l/min.m water flow rate provided sufficient conditions of temperature reduction (9.59 and 7.28C), relative humidity (63.88 and 61.21%), cooling efficiency (75.67 and 83.67 %), poultry weight (2.4 and 2.3 kg) and consumed energy (1.2 and 6 kW.day) with net return (7.54 and 5.80 LE/kg), in that order. Based on previously mentioned results, it is recommended to use direct evaporative cooling system for poultry houses as it minimizes both energy and cost requirements compared to the indirect evaporative cooling system, therefore it was found to be suitable for small rural farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"999-1010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2020.110328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2020.110328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

家禽生产在世界范围内的农业中占有重要地位。家禽舍设计在确定家禽的最佳健康、生长和生产性能的内部气候条件方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在评价不同蒸发冷却系统在禽舍环境控制中的性能。两种不同蒸发冷却系统(直接和间接)在2、4和6升/分钟三种水流量下的效果。从降温、相对湿度、蒸发冷却效率、家禽体重、能耗和成本等方面评价了M对禽舍性能的影响。实验结果表明,采用4 l/min的直接蒸发冷却系统。M水流量和间接蒸发冷却系统2l /min。m水流量可提供温度降低(9.59和7.28C)、相对湿度(63.88和61.21%)、冷却效率(75.67和83.67%)、禽重(2.4和2.3 kg)和能耗(1.2和6 kw .d)的充分条件,净收益分别为7.54和5.80 LE/kg。根据前面提到的结果,建议家禽舍使用直接蒸发冷却系统,因为与间接蒸发冷却系统相比,它可以最大限度地减少能源和成本需求,因此发现它适合小型农村农户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF POULTRY HOUSES UNDER DIFFERENT EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEMS
Poultry production occupied a major role in the agriculture industry worldwide. Poultry housing design plays a vital role in determination of the internal climatic conditions for optimum health, growth and productive performance of the poultries. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the performance of different evaporative cooling systems with environmental control of poultry houses. The effect of two different evaporative cooling systems (direct and indirect) under three water flow rates of 2, 4 and 6 l/min.m on poultry houses performance was evaluated in terms of temperature reduction, relative humidity, evaporative cooling efficiency, poultry weight, consumed energy and cost. Experimental results revealed that using direct evaporative cooling system with 4 l/min.m water flow rate and indirect evaporative cooling system with 2 l/min.m water flow rate provided sufficient conditions of temperature reduction (9.59 and 7.28C), relative humidity (63.88 and 61.21%), cooling efficiency (75.67 and 83.67 %), poultry weight (2.4 and 2.3 kg) and consumed energy (1.2 and 6 kW.day) with net return (7.54 and 5.80 LE/kg), in that order. Based on previously mentioned results, it is recommended to use direct evaporative cooling system for poultry houses as it minimizes both energy and cost requirements compared to the indirect evaporative cooling system, therefore it was found to be suitable for small rural farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信