自由港改革——政治经济分析(PEA)的经验教训,使冲突敏感性更有效

IF 1 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Mateo Cabello, C. Alberti
{"title":"自由港改革——政治经济分析(PEA)的经验教训,使冲突敏感性更有效","authors":"Mateo Cabello, C. Alberti","doi":"10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Political Economy Analysis (PEA), which is concerned with the interaction of political and economic processes, is a useful tool to improve the efficiency of development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding practice. However, it has important shortcomings too. Using the reforms in the Port of Freetown as a case study, this paper explores the most important ones while highlighting some of the elements undermining the successful operationalisation of conflict sensitivity. The article suggests that both tools should be mainstreamed within organisations as the first step to improve their effectiveness, which in turn requires a re-thinking of its operational and decision-making structures.","PeriodicalId":47576,"journal":{"name":"Development in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reform of freetown port – lessons from Political Economy Analysis (PEA) to make conflict sensitivity more efficient\",\"authors\":\"Mateo Cabello, C. Alberti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n Political Economy Analysis (PEA), which is concerned with the interaction of political and economic processes, is a useful tool to improve the efficiency of development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding practice. However, it has important shortcomings too. Using the reforms in the Port of Freetown as a case study, this paper explores the most important ones while highlighting some of the elements undermining the successful operationalisation of conflict sensitivity. The article suggests that both tools should be mainstreamed within organisations as the first step to improve their effectiveness, which in turn requires a re-thinking of its operational and decision-making structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治经济分析(PEA)关注政治和经济进程的相互作用,是提高发展、人道主义和建设和平实践效率的有用工具。然而,它也有重要的缺点。本文以弗里敦港的改革为例,探讨了其中最重要的改革,同时强调了影响冲突敏感性成功运作的一些因素。这篇文章建议,这两种工具都应该在组织内部主流化,作为提高其有效性的第一步,这反过来又需要重新思考其运营和决策结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The reform of freetown port – lessons from Political Economy Analysis (PEA) to make conflict sensitivity more efficient
ABSTRACT Political Economy Analysis (PEA), which is concerned with the interaction of political and economic processes, is a useful tool to improve the efficiency of development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding practice. However, it has important shortcomings too. Using the reforms in the Port of Freetown as a case study, this paper explores the most important ones while highlighting some of the elements undermining the successful operationalisation of conflict sensitivity. The article suggests that both tools should be mainstreamed within organisations as the first step to improve their effectiveness, which in turn requires a re-thinking of its operational and decision-making structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development in Practice
Development in Practice DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Gain free access to articles published in the special issue on Citizen"s Media and communication, and watch videos from Conversations with the Earth an indigenous-led multimedia campaign exhibiting at COP15 in Copenhagen. Development in Practice offers practice-based analysis and research relating to development and humanitarianism providing a worldwide forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences among practitioners, scholars, policy shapers, and activists. By challenging current assumptions, and by active editorial engagement with issues of diversity and social justice, the journal seeks to stimulate new thinking and ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信