保理交易中应收账款转让当事人的法律保护

Yuridika Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v37i1.32169
Shohib Muslim
{"title":"保理交易中应收账款转让当事人的法律保护","authors":"Shohib Muslim","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v37i1.32169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An agreement can be born not enough just by the will; the will is not stated according to the theory of statements (verklaring theory). Furthermore, according to the theory of trust (vertrouwens theory), it is argued that the stated will becomes an agreement that can produce an agreement. We attempted to identify the existence of an agreement factoring and transfer of receivables in the practice of factoring transactions that have provided legal protection to the parties in the perspective of consumer protection and the principle of freedom of contract. Here, we conducted a legal analysis on certain legal phenomena in Indonesia related to factoring transaction. The scope of this study was limited to factoring activities of a financing nature, particularly related to the purchase and transfer of receivables in factoring transactions in Indonesia (domestic factoring). Philosophical issues related to factoring transactions, where factoring is an institution adopted from the British legal system and the American legal system (common law), influenced by the understanding and principles of materialism, individualism and liberalism, while the Indonesian legal system is based on Pancasila, based on the principles of God, kinship, togetherness and mutual cooperation, balance, and responsible freedom. In our analysis, we found that the process of making the agreement is prepared and determined unilaterally by the factor by providing a very minimal portion for the client to negotiate. Thus, the factoring agreement does not fulfill the principle of balance and the principle of freedom of contract.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Protection for Parties in Transferring Receivables from Factoring Transactions (Factoring)\",\"authors\":\"Shohib Muslim\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ydk.v37i1.32169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An agreement can be born not enough just by the will; the will is not stated according to the theory of statements (verklaring theory). Furthermore, according to the theory of trust (vertrouwens theory), it is argued that the stated will becomes an agreement that can produce an agreement. We attempted to identify the existence of an agreement factoring and transfer of receivables in the practice of factoring transactions that have provided legal protection to the parties in the perspective of consumer protection and the principle of freedom of contract. Here, we conducted a legal analysis on certain legal phenomena in Indonesia related to factoring transaction. The scope of this study was limited to factoring activities of a financing nature, particularly related to the purchase and transfer of receivables in factoring transactions in Indonesia (domestic factoring). Philosophical issues related to factoring transactions, where factoring is an institution adopted from the British legal system and the American legal system (common law), influenced by the understanding and principles of materialism, individualism and liberalism, while the Indonesian legal system is based on Pancasila, based on the principles of God, kinship, togetherness and mutual cooperation, balance, and responsible freedom. In our analysis, we found that the process of making the agreement is prepared and determined unilaterally by the factor by providing a very minimal portion for the client to negotiate. Thus, the factoring agreement does not fulfill the principle of balance and the principle of freedom of contract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yuridika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yuridika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.32169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.32169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一份协议可以诞生,仅仅凭意志不够;意志不是根据陈述理论(verklaring理论)来陈述的。此外,根据信任理论(vertrouwens理论),认为陈述的意志成为可以产生协议的协议。我们试图在保理交易的实践中,从消费者保护和合同自由原则的角度,找出保理交易中存在的为当事人提供法律保护的应收账款转让协议。在这里,我们对印尼与保理交易相关的一些法律现象进行了法律分析。本研究的范围仅限于融资性质的保理活动,特别是与印度尼西亚保理交易(国内保理)中应收账款的购买和转让有关的保理活动。保理交易的哲学问题,保理是英国法系和美国法系(英美法系)的制度,受到唯物主义、个人主义和自由主义的理解和原则的影响,而印尼法系则是潘卡西拉(Pancasila),基于上帝、血缘、团结互助、平衡、负责任的自由原则。在我们的分析中,我们发现制定协议的过程是由因素单方面准备和决定的,提供了非常小的一部分给客户谈判。因此,保理协议没有履行平衡原则和合同自由原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Protection for Parties in Transferring Receivables from Factoring Transactions (Factoring)
An agreement can be born not enough just by the will; the will is not stated according to the theory of statements (verklaring theory). Furthermore, according to the theory of trust (vertrouwens theory), it is argued that the stated will becomes an agreement that can produce an agreement. We attempted to identify the existence of an agreement factoring and transfer of receivables in the practice of factoring transactions that have provided legal protection to the parties in the perspective of consumer protection and the principle of freedom of contract. Here, we conducted a legal analysis on certain legal phenomena in Indonesia related to factoring transaction. The scope of this study was limited to factoring activities of a financing nature, particularly related to the purchase and transfer of receivables in factoring transactions in Indonesia (domestic factoring). Philosophical issues related to factoring transactions, where factoring is an institution adopted from the British legal system and the American legal system (common law), influenced by the understanding and principles of materialism, individualism and liberalism, while the Indonesian legal system is based on Pancasila, based on the principles of God, kinship, togetherness and mutual cooperation, balance, and responsible freedom. In our analysis, we found that the process of making the agreement is prepared and determined unilaterally by the factor by providing a very minimal portion for the client to negotiate. Thus, the factoring agreement does not fulfill the principle of balance and the principle of freedom of contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信