裁判案例研究法第二部分:编者简介

D. Fishman
{"title":"裁判案例研究法第二部分:编者简介","authors":"D. Fishman","doi":"10.14713/pcsp.v17i2.2093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces readers to the present PCSP issue on the \"adjudicated case study method.\" This method employs concepts from the law for evaluating qualitative information to determine the truth of statements about human psychology and behavior, including causal statements about psychotherapy outcome. Two models of the adjudicated case study method, which were originally presented in PCSP in 2011, are covered: Ronald Miller’s \"Panels of Psychological Inquiry\" (PPI), and Arthur Bohart’s \"Research Jury Method.\" The issue concludes with a Commentary by Robert Elliott, Susan Stephen, and Anna Robinson. ","PeriodicalId":53239,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adjudicated Case Study Method, Part 2: Editor’s Introduction\",\"authors\":\"D. Fishman\",\"doi\":\"10.14713/pcsp.v17i2.2093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article introduces readers to the present PCSP issue on the \\\"adjudicated case study method.\\\" This method employs concepts from the law for evaluating qualitative information to determine the truth of statements about human psychology and behavior, including causal statements about psychotherapy outcome. Two models of the adjudicated case study method, which were originally presented in PCSP in 2011, are covered: Ronald Miller’s \\\"Panels of Psychological Inquiry\\\" (PPI), and Arthur Bohart’s \\\"Research Jury Method.\\\" The issue concludes with a Commentary by Robert Elliott, Susan Stephen, and Anna Robinson. \",\"PeriodicalId\":53239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i2.2093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i2.2093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文向读者介绍了目前PCSP问题上的“裁决案例研究方法”。这种方法利用法律中的概念来评估定性信息,以确定关于人类心理和行为的陈述的真实性,包括关于心理治疗结果的因果陈述。本文涵盖了最初于2011年在PCSP上提出的两种裁决案例研究方法模型:罗纳德·米勒的“心理调查小组”(PPI)和阿瑟·博哈特的“研究陪审团方法”。这期杂志以罗伯特·艾略特、苏珊·斯蒂芬和安娜·罗宾逊的评论结尾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Adjudicated Case Study Method, Part 2: Editor’s Introduction
This article introduces readers to the present PCSP issue on the "adjudicated case study method." This method employs concepts from the law for evaluating qualitative information to determine the truth of statements about human psychology and behavior, including causal statements about psychotherapy outcome. Two models of the adjudicated case study method, which were originally presented in PCSP in 2011, are covered: Ronald Miller’s "Panels of Psychological Inquiry" (PPI), and Arthur Bohart’s "Research Jury Method." The issue concludes with a Commentary by Robert Elliott, Susan Stephen, and Anna Robinson. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信