机构能力建设:墨西哥跨国安全治理的知识生产

IF 1.4 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Peter Finkenbusch
{"title":"机构能力建设:墨西哥跨国安全治理的知识生产","authors":"Peter Finkenbusch","doi":"10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article engages with institutionalist knowledge production in US-Mexican security relations, demonstrating how anti-crime governance in the Americas has shifted from a heavy-handed military rationale to a good governance and civil society–centred approach. This shift has been facilitated by the newly emerging resilience discourse which advocates turning local communities from passive beneficiaries of government-sponsored law enforcement into pro-active security partners. It will be argued that the rise of good governance and society-centred policy thinking has enhanced the epistemic authority of a heterogeneous, but ideologically aligned set of human rights advocacy groups, think tanks, policy-oriented academics and for-profit development NGOs – both in Mexico and the United States. This transnational expert community has been instrumental in inserting the issue of drug-related violent crime in Mexico into a globally dominant statebuilding framework. In consequence, security governance in Mexico has taken on a more transnational character and become the object of a highly intrusive international monitoring regime.","PeriodicalId":12676,"journal":{"name":"Global Crime","volume":"19 1","pages":"211 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building institutional capacity: knowledge production for transnational security governance in Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Peter Finkenbusch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article engages with institutionalist knowledge production in US-Mexican security relations, demonstrating how anti-crime governance in the Americas has shifted from a heavy-handed military rationale to a good governance and civil society–centred approach. This shift has been facilitated by the newly emerging resilience discourse which advocates turning local communities from passive beneficiaries of government-sponsored law enforcement into pro-active security partners. It will be argued that the rise of good governance and society-centred policy thinking has enhanced the epistemic authority of a heterogeneous, but ideologically aligned set of human rights advocacy groups, think tanks, policy-oriented academics and for-profit development NGOs – both in Mexico and the United States. This transnational expert community has been instrumental in inserting the issue of drug-related violent crime in Mexico into a globally dominant statebuilding framework. In consequence, security governance in Mexico has taken on a more transnational character and become the object of a highly intrusive international monitoring regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Crime\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"211 - 227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Crime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2018.1477599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文涉及美墨安全关系中的制度主义知识生产,展示了美洲的反犯罪治理如何从严厉的军事理由转变为以良好治理和公民社会为中心的方法。这一转变得益于新出现的韧性话语,该话语主张将当地社区从政府资助执法的被动受益者转变为积极的安全合作伙伴。有人认为,善政和以社会为中心的政策思维的兴起增强了墨西哥和美国一批异质但意识形态一致的人权倡导团体、智库、政策导向的学者和营利性发展非政府组织的认识权威。这个跨国专家团体在将墨西哥与毒品有关的暴力犯罪问题纳入全球主导的国家建设框架方面发挥了重要作用。因此,墨西哥的安全治理具有更大的跨国性质,成为高度侵入性的国际监测制度的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building institutional capacity: knowledge production for transnational security governance in Mexico
ABSTRACT This article engages with institutionalist knowledge production in US-Mexican security relations, demonstrating how anti-crime governance in the Americas has shifted from a heavy-handed military rationale to a good governance and civil society–centred approach. This shift has been facilitated by the newly emerging resilience discourse which advocates turning local communities from passive beneficiaries of government-sponsored law enforcement into pro-active security partners. It will be argued that the rise of good governance and society-centred policy thinking has enhanced the epistemic authority of a heterogeneous, but ideologically aligned set of human rights advocacy groups, think tanks, policy-oriented academics and for-profit development NGOs – both in Mexico and the United States. This transnational expert community has been instrumental in inserting the issue of drug-related violent crime in Mexico into a globally dominant statebuilding framework. In consequence, security governance in Mexico has taken on a more transnational character and become the object of a highly intrusive international monitoring regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Crime
Global Crime CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Global Crime is a social science journal devoted to the study of crime broadly conceived. Its focus is deliberately broad and multi-disciplinary and its first aim is to make the best scholarship on crime available to specialists and non-specialists alike. It endorses no particular orthodoxy and draws on authors from a variety of disciplines, including history, sociology, criminology, economics, political science, anthropology and area studies. The editors welcome contributions on any topic relating to crime, including organized criminality, its history, activities, relations with the state, its penetration of the economy and its perception in popular culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信