桉树和Ipomoea施用除草剂后无植物毒性

Ilca Puertas de Freitas e Silva, Josué Ferreira Silva Junior, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Edivaldo Domingues Velini, Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, L. Tropaldi, João Domingos Rodrigues
{"title":"桉树和Ipomoea施用除草剂后无植物毒性","authors":"Ilca Puertas de Freitas e Silva, Josué Ferreira Silva Junior, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Edivaldo Domingues Velini, Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, L. Tropaldi, João Domingos Rodrigues","doi":"10.18011/bioeng.2023.v17.1069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of weeds in forest estates is considered one of the biggest problems in the implantation, maintenance, and renovation of eucalyptus plantations. This research aims to evaluate the phytotoxicity of herbicides on eucalyptus and I. nil. The experiment was installed inside a greenhouse in a completely randomized design with five replications. The treatments consisted of the application of 0.2% (v/v) adjuvant with the herbicides: atrazine (2250 g i.a. ha-1), clomazone (720 g i.a. ha-1), sulfentrazone (600 g i.a. ha-1), glyphosate (1440 g i.a. ha-1), and control. The following variables were analyzed: electron transport rate (ETR), water consumption, and plant phytotoxicity. For I. nil plants treated with atrazine, it was possible to detect phytotoxicity previous to the appearance of symptoms in the visual analysis, due to the inhibition of ETR at 24 hours after application (HAA). The highest levels of phytotoxicity for eucalyptus and I. nil were obtained by glyphosate and sulfentrazone, respectively.","PeriodicalId":32292,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eucalyptus and Ipomoea nil phytotoxicity after herbicide application\",\"authors\":\"Ilca Puertas de Freitas e Silva, Josué Ferreira Silva Junior, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Edivaldo Domingues Velini, Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, L. Tropaldi, João Domingos Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.18011/bioeng.2023.v17.1069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presence of weeds in forest estates is considered one of the biggest problems in the implantation, maintenance, and renovation of eucalyptus plantations. This research aims to evaluate the phytotoxicity of herbicides on eucalyptus and I. nil. The experiment was installed inside a greenhouse in a completely randomized design with five replications. The treatments consisted of the application of 0.2% (v/v) adjuvant with the herbicides: atrazine (2250 g i.a. ha-1), clomazone (720 g i.a. ha-1), sulfentrazone (600 g i.a. ha-1), glyphosate (1440 g i.a. ha-1), and control. The following variables were analyzed: electron transport rate (ETR), water consumption, and plant phytotoxicity. For I. nil plants treated with atrazine, it was possible to detect phytotoxicity previous to the appearance of symptoms in the visual analysis, due to the inhibition of ETR at 24 hours after application (HAA). The highest levels of phytotoxicity for eucalyptus and I. nil were obtained by glyphosate and sulfentrazone, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng.2023.v17.1069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng.2023.v17.1069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

林地中杂草的存在被认为是桉树种植园种植、维护和翻新中最大的问题之一。本研究旨在评价除草剂对桉树和I.nil的植物毒性。该实验以完全随机的设计安装在温室内,共进行了五次重复。处理包括施用0.2%(v/v)的佐剂和除草剂:阿特拉津(2250 g i.a.ha-1)、氯马松(720 g i.a.ha-1)、亚磺甲唑酮(600 g i.a.a-1)、草甘膦(1440 g i.a.ha-1)和对照。分析了以下变量:电子传输速率(ETR)、耗水量和植物毒性。对于用阿特拉津处理的I.nil植物,由于施用后24小时ETR的抑制作用(HAA),在视觉分析中可以在症状出现之前检测到植物毒性。草甘膦和亚磺甲唑酮对桉树和I.nil的植物毒性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eucalyptus and Ipomoea nil phytotoxicity after herbicide application
The presence of weeds in forest estates is considered one of the biggest problems in the implantation, maintenance, and renovation of eucalyptus plantations. This research aims to evaluate the phytotoxicity of herbicides on eucalyptus and I. nil. The experiment was installed inside a greenhouse in a completely randomized design with five replications. The treatments consisted of the application of 0.2% (v/v) adjuvant with the herbicides: atrazine (2250 g i.a. ha-1), clomazone (720 g i.a. ha-1), sulfentrazone (600 g i.a. ha-1), glyphosate (1440 g i.a. ha-1), and control. The following variables were analyzed: electron transport rate (ETR), water consumption, and plant phytotoxicity. For I. nil plants treated with atrazine, it was possible to detect phytotoxicity previous to the appearance of symptoms in the visual analysis, due to the inhibition of ETR at 24 hours after application (HAA). The highest levels of phytotoxicity for eucalyptus and I. nil were obtained by glyphosate and sulfentrazone, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信