被否定的正义:现代主义时代文学、法律和精神分析的否定

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vicky Sparrow
{"title":"被否定的正义:现代主义时代文学、法律和精神分析的否定","authors":"Vicky Sparrow","doi":"10.16995/olh.490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article triangulates three scenes in which law, psychoanalysis and literary modernism intersect, in order to excavate differing conceptions of the idea of denial. The article begins with a consideration of the landmark censorship case against the editors of The Little Review, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, for serialising James Joyce’s ‘obscene’ modernism; the article then shifts to the poet HD’s account of psychoanalysis with Sigmund Freud; and finally reflects on how HD’s poetic practice re-articulates ideas around psychoanalysis, law and denial. Drawing on thinkers across the fields of poetics, psychoanalysis and critical legal studies, this article argues that the concept of denial indexes a fundamental tension between the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis and the law. This article further argues that HD’s poetic practice seeks a mode of writing which can both represent and resist such theoretical constraint and contradiction.","PeriodicalId":43026,"journal":{"name":"Open Library of Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice Denied: Literary, Legal and Psychoanalytic Denial in the Age of Modernism\",\"authors\":\"Vicky Sparrow\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/olh.490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article triangulates three scenes in which law, psychoanalysis and literary modernism intersect, in order to excavate differing conceptions of the idea of denial. The article begins with a consideration of the landmark censorship case against the editors of The Little Review, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, for serialising James Joyce’s ‘obscene’ modernism; the article then shifts to the poet HD’s account of psychoanalysis with Sigmund Freud; and finally reflects on how HD’s poetic practice re-articulates ideas around psychoanalysis, law and denial. Drawing on thinkers across the fields of poetics, psychoanalysis and critical legal studies, this article argues that the concept of denial indexes a fundamental tension between the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis and the law. This article further argues that HD’s poetic practice seeks a mode of writing which can both represent and resist such theoretical constraint and contradiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Library of Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Library of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Library of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对法律、精神分析和文学现代主义三者相互交织的三个场景进行三角分析,挖掘出对否定观念的不同理解。文章首先考虑了对《小评论》编辑玛格丽特·安德森和简·希普具有里程碑意义的审查案件,因为他们连载了詹姆斯·乔伊斯的“淫秽”现代主义;然后文章转到诗人HD对西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的精神分析的描述;最后反思赫德的诗歌实践如何重新阐明围绕精神分析、法律和否认的思想。本文借鉴了诗学、精神分析和批判性法律研究领域的思想家,认为否定的概念表明了精神分析和法律理论框架之间的根本紧张关系。本文进一步认为,汉德的诗歌实践寻求一种既能表现这种理论约束和矛盾,又能抵抗这种理论约束和矛盾的写作模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice Denied: Literary, Legal and Psychoanalytic Denial in the Age of Modernism
This article triangulates three scenes in which law, psychoanalysis and literary modernism intersect, in order to excavate differing conceptions of the idea of denial. The article begins with a consideration of the landmark censorship case against the editors of The Little Review, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, for serialising James Joyce’s ‘obscene’ modernism; the article then shifts to the poet HD’s account of psychoanalysis with Sigmund Freud; and finally reflects on how HD’s poetic practice re-articulates ideas around psychoanalysis, law and denial. Drawing on thinkers across the fields of poetics, psychoanalysis and critical legal studies, this article argues that the concept of denial indexes a fundamental tension between the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis and the law. This article further argues that HD’s poetic practice seeks a mode of writing which can both represent and resist such theoretical constraint and contradiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Library of Humanities
Open Library of Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Open Library of Humanities is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal open to submissions from researchers working in any humanities'' discipline in any language. The journal is funded by an international library consortium and has no charges to authors or readers. The Open Library of Humanities is digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS archive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信