西咪替丁治疗腮腺炎疗效的meta分析

Shiwei Wang, Chenyu Wang
{"title":"西咪替丁治疗腮腺炎疗效的meta分析","authors":"Shiwei Wang, Chenyu Wang","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v6i6.4479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps by meta-analysis. Methods: Controlled trials of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps were searched through China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Cqvip, Pubmed, The Cochrane Library and EMBase databases up to September 2022. The effective rate, the time of swelling regression in parotid gland area and the rate of adverse reactions were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: The final 10 articles included 920 children, including 427 in the trial group and 447 in the control group. Meta analysis showed that the effective rate of cimetidine in the treatment of mumps was higher than that of ribavirin in routine treatment, with a statistically significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 5.2, P < 0.00001); The time of swelling regression was statistically significant (OR = -1.28, P < 0.00001); The difference of adverse reaction rate was not statistically significant (OR = 0.73, P = 0.62). Conclusions: Compared with ribavirin, cimetidine is more effective in the treatment of mumps, with shorter swelling regression time without increases of adverse reactions.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Cimetidine in the Treatment of Mumps\",\"authors\":\"Shiwei Wang, Chenyu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.26689/jcnr.v6i6.4479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the efficacy of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps by meta-analysis. Methods: Controlled trials of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps were searched through China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Cqvip, Pubmed, The Cochrane Library and EMBase databases up to September 2022. The effective rate, the time of swelling regression in parotid gland area and the rate of adverse reactions were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: The final 10 articles included 920 children, including 427 in the trial group and 447 in the control group. Meta analysis showed that the effective rate of cimetidine in the treatment of mumps was higher than that of ribavirin in routine treatment, with a statistically significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 5.2, P < 0.00001); The time of swelling regression was statistically significant (OR = -1.28, P < 0.00001); The difference of adverse reaction rate was not statistically significant (OR = 0.73, P = 0.62). Conclusions: Compared with ribavirin, cimetidine is more effective in the treatment of mumps, with shorter swelling regression time without increases of adverse reactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"临床护理研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"临床护理研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v6i6.4479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v6i6.4479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过荟萃分析比较西咪替丁与利巴韦林治疗腮腺炎的疗效。方法:检索截至2022年9月的中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据、Cqvip、Pubmed、the Cochrane Library和EMBase数据库中有关西咪替丁和利巴韦林治疗腮腺炎的对照试验。采用Review Manager 5.3软件分析有效率、腮腺肿大消退时间及不良反应发生率。结果:最终10篇文章纳入920名儿童,其中试验组427名,对照组447名。Meta分析显示,西咪替丁治疗腮腺炎的有效率高于常规治疗利巴韦林,差异有统计学意义(优势比[OR] = 5.2, P < 0.00001);肿胀回归时间有统计学意义(OR = -1.28, P < 0.00001);两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(OR = 0.73, P = 0.62)。结论:与利巴韦林相比,西咪替丁治疗腮腺炎更有效,肿胀消退时间更短,且不良反应未增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Cimetidine in the Treatment of Mumps
Objective: To compare the efficacy of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps by meta-analysis. Methods: Controlled trials of cimetidine and ribavirin in the treatment of mumps were searched through China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Cqvip, Pubmed, The Cochrane Library and EMBase databases up to September 2022. The effective rate, the time of swelling regression in parotid gland area and the rate of adverse reactions were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: The final 10 articles included 920 children, including 427 in the trial group and 447 in the control group. Meta analysis showed that the effective rate of cimetidine in the treatment of mumps was higher than that of ribavirin in routine treatment, with a statistically significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 5.2, P < 0.00001); The time of swelling regression was statistically significant (OR = -1.28, P < 0.00001); The difference of adverse reaction rate was not statistically significant (OR = 0.73, P = 0.62). Conclusions: Compared with ribavirin, cimetidine is more effective in the treatment of mumps, with shorter swelling regression time without increases of adverse reactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信