卢旺达lgbt权利的局限:国际行动与国内抹杀

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Emma Paszat
{"title":"卢旺达lgbt权利的局限:国际行动与国内抹杀","authors":"Emma Paszat","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2079319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When African countries and lgbt people are written about, a lot of the focus is on elites’ use of politicized homophobias to target lgbt people. However, there has been significantly less attention paid to countries where governments do not politicize homophobia, but also do not legislate for lgbt people’s human rights. Rwanda is one such country where senior government officials, including the President, have declined to politicize homophobia, even whilst many of their neighbours were doing so. However, lgbt activists report that discrimination remains widespread in the country, including from state actors. Therefore, it is surprising that at the United Nations Rwanda has increasingly although not universally moved to supporting lgbt rights positions. Rather than assuming Rwanda has adopted these differing positions for coercive reasons due to donor pressure or because of officials’ personal beliefs, I argue the Rwandan government’s approach is a strategic recognition of the importance of Global South actors supporting lgbt rights. Rwanda’s government does more internationally than domestically, but this is still enough to differentiate the country from its neighbours, and this gives it power in the international system as a Global South government that is willing to support lgbt rights internationally.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"44 1","pages":"424 - 438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Limits of lgbt Rights in Rwanda: International Action and Domestic Erasure\",\"authors\":\"Emma Paszat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2022.2079319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract When African countries and lgbt people are written about, a lot of the focus is on elites’ use of politicized homophobias to target lgbt people. However, there has been significantly less attention paid to countries where governments do not politicize homophobia, but also do not legislate for lgbt people’s human rights. Rwanda is one such country where senior government officials, including the President, have declined to politicize homophobia, even whilst many of their neighbours were doing so. However, lgbt activists report that discrimination remains widespread in the country, including from state actors. Therefore, it is surprising that at the United Nations Rwanda has increasingly although not universally moved to supporting lgbt rights positions. Rather than assuming Rwanda has adopted these differing positions for coercive reasons due to donor pressure or because of officials’ personal beliefs, I argue the Rwandan government’s approach is a strategic recognition of the importance of Global South actors supporting lgbt rights. Rwanda’s government does more internationally than domestically, but this is still enough to differentiate the country from its neighbours, and this gives it power in the international system as a Global South government that is willing to support lgbt rights internationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"424 - 438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2079319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2079319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当人们写非洲国家和lgbt群体时,很多焦点都集中在精英们利用政治化的同性恋恐惧症来针对lgbt群体。然而,对于那些政府没有将同性恋恐惧症政治化,但也没有为lgbt人群的人权立法的国家,人们的关注明显较少。卢旺达就是这样一个国家,包括总统在内的高级政府官员拒绝将恐同政治化,尽管他们的许多邻国正在这样做。然而,lgbt活动人士报告说,歧视在该国仍然普遍存在,包括来自国家行为者的歧视。因此,令人惊讶的是,卢旺达在联合国越来越多地(尽管不是普遍地)支持lgbt权利立场。我并不认为卢旺达之所以采取这些不同的立场是出于捐赠者的压力或官员的个人信仰,而是认为卢旺达政府的做法是对全球南方国家支持lgbt权利的重要性的战略认识。卢旺达政府在国际上比在国内做得更多,但这仍然足以将该国与邻国区分开来,这使它在国际体系中成为一个愿意在国际上支持lgbt权利的全球南方政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Limits of lgbt Rights in Rwanda: International Action and Domestic Erasure
Abstract When African countries and lgbt people are written about, a lot of the focus is on elites’ use of politicized homophobias to target lgbt people. However, there has been significantly less attention paid to countries where governments do not politicize homophobia, but also do not legislate for lgbt people’s human rights. Rwanda is one such country where senior government officials, including the President, have declined to politicize homophobia, even whilst many of their neighbours were doing so. However, lgbt activists report that discrimination remains widespread in the country, including from state actors. Therefore, it is surprising that at the United Nations Rwanda has increasingly although not universally moved to supporting lgbt rights positions. Rather than assuming Rwanda has adopted these differing positions for coercive reasons due to donor pressure or because of officials’ personal beliefs, I argue the Rwandan government’s approach is a strategic recognition of the importance of Global South actors supporting lgbt rights. Rwanda’s government does more internationally than domestically, but this is still enough to differentiate the country from its neighbours, and this gives it power in the international system as a Global South government that is willing to support lgbt rights internationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信