常规酸蚀和自蚀底漆对正畸托槽与恒牙结合剪切强度的体外比较研究

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R. Bilal
{"title":"常规酸蚀和自蚀底漆对正畸托槽与恒牙结合剪切强度的体外比较研究","authors":"R. Bilal","doi":"10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_41_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to permanent teeth with a conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems. Also, the study aims to evaluate the mode of bond failure after debonding the brackets. Materials and Methods: It was an experimental study. Fifty extracted permanent premolars were collected, checked, and cleaned. Teeth were split equally into two groups, group A and B. Orthodontic brackets were bonded using conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems for group A and B, respectively. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured with a universal testing machine, and the mode of bracket-adhesive failure was determined by using adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analyzed with a statistical software. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the SBS and Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess whether there is a significant difference of ARI score between the groups. Results: Although the SBS with self-etching primer was within clinically acceptable range, the overall mean SBS for group A (14.71 MPa) was significantly greater than group B (9.24 MPa) (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in ARI scores between conventional acid-etching and self-etching groups (P = 0.801). Conclusion: The SBS of the conventional acid-etching was significantly higher than the self-etching primer. The SBS of self-etch was within the acceptable range to withstand the forces of mastication. The majority of the brackets recorded ARI score of 1 indicating a cohesive failure with no significant difference between acid-etch and self-etch groups.","PeriodicalId":43354,"journal":{"name":"Dental Hypotheses","volume":"12 1","pages":"155 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An In Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Permanent Teeth by Using Conventional Acid-Etching and Self-Etching Primers\",\"authors\":\"R. Bilal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_41_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to permanent teeth with a conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems. Also, the study aims to evaluate the mode of bond failure after debonding the brackets. Materials and Methods: It was an experimental study. Fifty extracted permanent premolars were collected, checked, and cleaned. Teeth were split equally into two groups, group A and B. Orthodontic brackets were bonded using conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems for group A and B, respectively. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured with a universal testing machine, and the mode of bracket-adhesive failure was determined by using adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analyzed with a statistical software. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the SBS and Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess whether there is a significant difference of ARI score between the groups. Results: Although the SBS with self-etching primer was within clinically acceptable range, the overall mean SBS for group A (14.71 MPa) was significantly greater than group B (9.24 MPa) (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in ARI scores between conventional acid-etching and self-etching groups (P = 0.801). Conclusion: The SBS of the conventional acid-etching was significantly higher than the self-etching primer. The SBS of self-etch was within the acceptable range to withstand the forces of mastication. The majority of the brackets recorded ARI score of 1 indicating a cohesive failure with no significant difference between acid-etch and self-etch groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Hypotheses\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Hypotheses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_41_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_41_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较传统酸蚀和自蚀底漆系统与恒牙结合的正畸托槽的结合强度。此外,本研究旨在评估托槽脱胶后的粘结失效模式。材料与方法:实验研究。收集、检查和清洁了50颗拔除的永久性前磨牙。将牙齿平均分为两组,A组和B组。分别使用常规酸蚀和自蚀底漆系统对A组和B组的正畸托槽进行粘接。在万能试验机上测定了支架的抗剪强度,并利用胶粘剂残留指数(ARI)确定了支架胶粘剂的失效模式。使用统计软件对数据进行分析。独立样本t检验用于比较SBS,Mann-Whitney U检验用于评估各组之间ARI评分是否存在显著差异。结果:尽管自蚀刻底漆的SBS在临床可接受的范围内,但A组的总平均SBS(14.71 MPa)显著高于B组(9.24 MPa)(P = 0.024)。常规酸蚀刻组和自蚀刻组的ARI评分无显著差异(P = 0.801)。结论:常规酸蚀的SBS明显高于自蚀底漆。自蚀刻的SBS在可接受的范围内以承受咀嚼力。大多数括号记录的ARI得分为1,表明酸蚀组和自蚀组之间没有显著差异的内聚失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An In Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Permanent Teeth by Using Conventional Acid-Etching and Self-Etching Primers
Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to permanent teeth with a conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems. Also, the study aims to evaluate the mode of bond failure after debonding the brackets. Materials and Methods: It was an experimental study. Fifty extracted permanent premolars were collected, checked, and cleaned. Teeth were split equally into two groups, group A and B. Orthodontic brackets were bonded using conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer systems for group A and B, respectively. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured with a universal testing machine, and the mode of bracket-adhesive failure was determined by using adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analyzed with a statistical software. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the SBS and Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess whether there is a significant difference of ARI score between the groups. Results: Although the SBS with self-etching primer was within clinically acceptable range, the overall mean SBS for group A (14.71 MPa) was significantly greater than group B (9.24 MPa) (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in ARI scores between conventional acid-etching and self-etching groups (P = 0.801). Conclusion: The SBS of the conventional acid-etching was significantly higher than the self-etching primer. The SBS of self-etch was within the acceptable range to withstand the forces of mastication. The majority of the brackets recorded ARI score of 1 indicating a cohesive failure with no significant difference between acid-etch and self-etch groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Hypotheses
Dental Hypotheses DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信