技术促进了再次受害:性暴力视频证据如何促成了经调解的虐待循环

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kaitlyn Regehr, A. Birze, C. Regehr
{"title":"技术促进了再次受害:性暴力视频证据如何促成了经调解的虐待循环","authors":"Kaitlyn Regehr, A. Birze, C. Regehr","doi":"10.1177/17416590211050333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the ubiquity of technological devices producing video and audio recordings, violent crimes are increasingly captured digitally and used as evidence in the criminal justice process. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study involving Canadian criminal justice professionals, and asks questions surrounding the treatment of video evidence and the rights of victims captured within such images. We argue that loss of control over personal images and narratives can re-traumatize survivors of sexual violence, creating technologically-facilitated cycles of abuse that are perpetuated each time images are viewed. We find that the justice system has little to no consistent policy or procedure for handling video evidence, or for ameliorating the impact of these digital records on survivors. Subsequently, we assert that the need for a victim-centred evidence-based understanding of mediated evidence has never been greater.","PeriodicalId":46658,"journal":{"name":"Crime Media Culture","volume":"18 1","pages":"597 - 615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology facilitated re-victimization: How video evidence of sexual violence contributes to mediated cycles of abuse\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn Regehr, A. Birze, C. Regehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17416590211050333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the ubiquity of technological devices producing video and audio recordings, violent crimes are increasingly captured digitally and used as evidence in the criminal justice process. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study involving Canadian criminal justice professionals, and asks questions surrounding the treatment of video evidence and the rights of victims captured within such images. We argue that loss of control over personal images and narratives can re-traumatize survivors of sexual violence, creating technologically-facilitated cycles of abuse that are perpetuated each time images are viewed. We find that the justice system has little to no consistent policy or procedure for handling video evidence, or for ameliorating the impact of these digital records on survivors. Subsequently, we assert that the need for a victim-centred evidence-based understanding of mediated evidence has never been greater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crime Media Culture\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"597 - 615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crime Media Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211050333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crime Media Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211050333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着制作视频和音频记录的技术设备的普遍存在,暴力犯罪越来越多地被数字捕获,并在刑事司法过程中用作证据。本文介绍了一项涉及加拿大刑事司法专业人员的定性研究的结果,并就视频证据的处理和在此类图像中捕捉到的受害者的权利提出了问题。我们认为,失去对个人图像和叙事的控制会使性暴力幸存者再次受到创伤,造成技术推动的虐待循环,每次观看图像时都会持续下去。我们发现,司法系统在处理视频证据或减轻这些数字记录对幸存者的影响方面几乎没有一致的政策或程序。随后,我们断言,对调解证据以受害者为中心的循证理解的必要性前所未有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology facilitated re-victimization: How video evidence of sexual violence contributes to mediated cycles of abuse
With the ubiquity of technological devices producing video and audio recordings, violent crimes are increasingly captured digitally and used as evidence in the criminal justice process. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study involving Canadian criminal justice professionals, and asks questions surrounding the treatment of video evidence and the rights of victims captured within such images. We argue that loss of control over personal images and narratives can re-traumatize survivors of sexual violence, creating technologically-facilitated cycles of abuse that are perpetuated each time images are viewed. We find that the justice system has little to no consistent policy or procedure for handling video evidence, or for ameliorating the impact of these digital records on survivors. Subsequently, we assert that the need for a victim-centred evidence-based understanding of mediated evidence has never been greater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Crime, Media, Culture is a fully peer reviewed, international journal providing the primary vehicle for exchange between scholars who are working at the intersections of criminological and cultural inquiry. It promotes a broad cross-disciplinary understanding of the relationship between crime, criminal justice, media and culture. The journal invites papers in three broad substantive areas: * The relationship between crime, criminal justice and media forms * The relationship between criminal justice and cultural dynamics * The intersections of crime, criminal justice, media forms and cultural dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信