在实践中运用批判性反思伦理来解决儿童权利研究中的代表性问题

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sonya Gaches
{"title":"在实践中运用批判性反思伦理来解决儿童权利研究中的代表性问题","authors":"Sonya Gaches","doi":"10.1177/2043610620959679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), concerns have been raised regarding tokenistic engagement with children’s participation rights as well as ethical considerations that must be addressed in research with children. This article explores how one particular ethical dilemma regarding representation and who can speak for whom in children’s rights-based research was confronted through critically reflexive ethics in practice. While publication of Ethical Research Involving Children and the ‘International Charter for Ethical Research Involving Children’ provide guidance for researchers, further illustration of how ethical dilemmas have been confronted and addressed within a particular research context could provide further guidance and insight regarding how critically reflexive ethics in practice can be utilised as a further contextual-based tool towards ethical research. Thus it is the intention that this illustrative example can encourage others who are engaged in research with children to continually undertake critically reflexive ethics in practice with their own ongoing research, consultation and engagements with young children.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"12 1","pages":"374 - 386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2043610620959679","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using critically reflexive ethics in practice to address issues of representation in children’s rights-based research\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Gaches\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2043610620959679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), concerns have been raised regarding tokenistic engagement with children’s participation rights as well as ethical considerations that must be addressed in research with children. This article explores how one particular ethical dilemma regarding representation and who can speak for whom in children’s rights-based research was confronted through critically reflexive ethics in practice. While publication of Ethical Research Involving Children and the ‘International Charter for Ethical Research Involving Children’ provide guidance for researchers, further illustration of how ethical dilemmas have been confronted and addressed within a particular research context could provide further guidance and insight regarding how critically reflexive ethics in practice can be utilised as a further contextual-based tool towards ethical research. Thus it is the intention that this illustrative example can encourage others who are engaged in research with children to continually undertake critically reflexive ethics in practice with their own ongoing research, consultation and engagements with young children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2043610620959679\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610620959679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610620959679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

自《联合国儿童权利公约》(UNCRC)问世以来,人们对象征性地参与儿童参与权以及在儿童研究中必须解决的伦理问题提出了担忧。本文探讨了一个特定的伦理困境,关于代表性和谁可以为谁说话,在儿童权利为基础的研究是如何面对通过批判性反思伦理在实践中。虽然《涉及儿童的伦理研究》和《涉及儿童的伦理研究国际宪章》的出版为研究人员提供了指导,但进一步说明在特定的研究背景下如何面对和解决伦理困境,可以为实践中的批判性反思伦理如何被用作进一步的基于背景的伦理研究工具提供进一步的指导和见解。因此,这个说明性的例子可以鼓励其他从事儿童研究的人在实践中不断地进行批判性反思伦理,并与幼儿进行持续的研究、咨询和接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using critically reflexive ethics in practice to address issues of representation in children’s rights-based research
Since the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), concerns have been raised regarding tokenistic engagement with children’s participation rights as well as ethical considerations that must be addressed in research with children. This article explores how one particular ethical dilemma regarding representation and who can speak for whom in children’s rights-based research was confronted through critically reflexive ethics in practice. While publication of Ethical Research Involving Children and the ‘International Charter for Ethical Research Involving Children’ provide guidance for researchers, further illustration of how ethical dilemmas have been confronted and addressed within a particular research context could provide further guidance and insight regarding how critically reflexive ethics in practice can be utilised as a further contextual-based tool towards ethical research. Thus it is the intention that this illustrative example can encourage others who are engaged in research with children to continually undertake critically reflexive ethics in practice with their own ongoing research, consultation and engagements with young children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Studies of Childhood
Global Studies of Childhood Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信