自我调节中内在言语的奇特事件:对莫林(2022)的反驳

P. Verhaeghen, Grazia Mirabito
{"title":"自我调节中内在言语的奇特事件:对莫林(2022)的反驳","authors":"P. Verhaeghen, Grazia Mirabito","doi":"10.21827/ijpp.8.38402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Morin (2022)’s first objection is that our findings are at odds with the literature. We show that they are not: (a) We already agreed that inner speech and executive control can be causally related under specific circumstances, including in development, and (b) we obtained the same pattern of correlations between self-awareness, inner speech, and self-regulation others have. We reiterate that the issue is not the correlations, but the lack of evidence for any mediated relationship between habitual inner speech and self-regulation. We also argue against Morin’s second point—the proposed inadequacy of our surveys. Ultimately, however, we feel that an empirical foray is needed to settle our differences and find truth, and we thus propose an adversarial collaboration to that effect.","PeriodicalId":91096,"journal":{"name":"International journal of personality psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The curious incident of inner speech in self-regulation: A rejoinder to Morin (2022)\",\"authors\":\"P. Verhaeghen, Grazia Mirabito\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/ijpp.8.38402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Morin (2022)’s first objection is that our findings are at odds with the literature. We show that they are not: (a) We already agreed that inner speech and executive control can be causally related under specific circumstances, including in development, and (b) we obtained the same pattern of correlations between self-awareness, inner speech, and self-regulation others have. We reiterate that the issue is not the correlations, but the lack of evidence for any mediated relationship between habitual inner speech and self-regulation. We also argue against Morin’s second point—the proposed inadequacy of our surveys. Ultimately, however, we feel that an empirical foray is needed to settle our differences and find truth, and we thus propose an adversarial collaboration to that effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of personality psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of personality psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.8.38402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of personality psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.8.38402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Morin(2022)的第一个反对意见是,我们的发现与文献不符。我们证明它们不是:(a)我们已经同意,在特定情况下,包括在发展过程中,内在言语和执行控制可能是因果相关的;(b)我们获得了自我意识、内在言语和自我调节之间相同的相关性模式。我们重申,问题不在于相关性,而是缺乏证据表明任何中介关系的习惯性内在言语和自我调节。我们也反对莫林的第二点,即我们调查的不足之处。然而,最终,我们认为需要一次经验的尝试来解决我们的分歧并找到真理,因此我们建议为此进行对抗性合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The curious incident of inner speech in self-regulation: A rejoinder to Morin (2022)
Morin (2022)’s first objection is that our findings are at odds with the literature. We show that they are not: (a) We already agreed that inner speech and executive control can be causally related under specific circumstances, including in development, and (b) we obtained the same pattern of correlations between self-awareness, inner speech, and self-regulation others have. We reiterate that the issue is not the correlations, but the lack of evidence for any mediated relationship between habitual inner speech and self-regulation. We also argue against Morin’s second point—the proposed inadequacy of our surveys. Ultimately, however, we feel that an empirical foray is needed to settle our differences and find truth, and we thus propose an adversarial collaboration to that effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信