评论＜人工智能医学应用的前景与风险＞一文中“责任归咎”的疑虑与可能的因应

IF 0.1 4区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.24112/ijccpm.171682

Wan-ling Chou

{"title":"评论＜人工智能医学应用的前景与风险＞一文中“责任归咎”的疑虑与可能的因应","authors":"Wan-ling Chou","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.171682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.The ultimate result of AI medicine may be the birth of \"Dr. Super AI.\" Dr. Super AI would not only supplement medical care, but also acquire a level of autonomy. Its capacity for reason would be much greater than that of most human doctors, but it would not possess certain intrinsic characteristics of human beings, so it would fall somewhere between \"machine\" and \"human.\" This raises an important question: if such an agent makes mistakes, who or what is responsible? This paper argues that this \"responsibility gap\" is not insurmountable. If the types of mistakes made by Dr. Super AI can be distinguished, we can find the corresponding object of responsibility. This is a viable countermeasure, at least until AI robots have developed human emotions and moral awareness.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 28 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"評論＜人工智能醫學應用的前景與風險＞一文中“責任歸咎”的疑慮與可能的因應\",\"authors\":\"Wan-ling Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.24112/ijccpm.171682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.The ultimate result of AI medicine may be the birth of \\\"Dr. Super AI.\\\" Dr. Super AI would not only supplement medical care, but also acquire a level of autonomy. Its capacity for reason would be much greater than that of most human doctors, but it would not possess certain intrinsic characteristics of human beings, so it would fall somewhere between \\\"machine\\\" and \\\"human.\\\" This raises an important question: if such an agent makes mistakes, who or what is responsible? This paper argues that this \\\"responsibility gap\\\" is not insurmountable. If the types of mistakes made by Dr. Super AI can be distinguished, we can find the corresponding object of responsibility. This is a viable countermeasure, at least until AI robots have developed human emotions and moral awareness.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 28 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.171682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.171682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

|中文文件文本;只有英文摘要。人工智能医学的最终结果可能是“超级人工智能博士”的诞生。超级人工智能医生不仅可以补充医疗服务，还可以获得一定程度的自主权。它的推理能力将比大多数人类医生强得多，但它不具备人类固有的某些特征，因此它将介于“机器”和“人类”之间。这就提出了一个重要的问题:如果这样的代理人犯了错误，谁或什么应该负责?本文认为，这种“责任鸿沟”并非不可逾越。如果可以区分Dr. Super AI所犯的错误类型，我们就可以找到相应的责任对象。这是一个可行的对策，至少在人工智能机器人发展出人类的情感和道德意识之前。下载历史b|在迁移到这个平台之前，这篇文章在数字共享资源已经被下载了28次。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

評論＜人工智能醫學應用的前景與風險＞一文中“責任歸咎”的疑慮與可能的因應

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.The ultimate result of AI medicine may be the birth of "Dr. Super AI." Dr. Super AI would not only supplement medical care, but also acquire a level of autonomy. Its capacity for reason would be much greater than that of most human doctors, but it would not possess certain intrinsic characteristics of human beings, so it would fall somewhere between "machine" and "human." This raises an important question: if such an agent makes mistakes, who or what is responsible? This paper argues that this "responsibility gap" is not insurmountable. If the types of mistakes made by Dr. Super AI can be distinguished, we can find the corresponding object of responsibility. This is a viable countermeasure, at least until AI robots have developed human emotions and moral awareness.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 28 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

自引率

0.00%

发文量