Owen Lovejoy和平等联盟：神职人员、非裔美国人和妇女团结起来废除死刑

IF 0.3 4区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

HISTORIAN Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00182370.2023.2230060

J. McDonald

{"title":"Owen Lovejoy和平等联盟：神职人员、非裔美国人和妇女团结起来废除死刑","authors":"J. McDonald","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2023.2230060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a post-1619-Project climate, some biographical historians are compelled to pour new critical stances into their lifelong research, often stretching previous insights or little-known back scripts to the point of banality. In some respects, Jane Anne Moore and William F. Moore’s Owen Lovejoy and the Coalition for Equality demonstrates both the rock of affirming African Americans and women in the story of abolitionism and the hard place, where critical race theory redundantly highlights dehumanization and disenfranchisement. In their introduction, the authors address this uncomfortable position (11):","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Owen Lovejoy and the coalition for equality: clergy, African Americans, and women united for abolition\",\"authors\":\"J. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00182370.2023.2230060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a post-1619-Project climate, some biographical historians are compelled to pour new critical stances into their lifelong research, often stretching previous insights or little-known back scripts to the point of banality. In some respects, Jane Anne Moore and William F. Moore’s Owen Lovejoy and the Coalition for Equality demonstrates both the rock of affirming African Americans and women in the story of abolitionism and the hard place, where critical race theory redundantly highlights dehumanization and disenfranchisement. In their introduction, the authors address this uncomfortable position (11):\",\"PeriodicalId\":44078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISTORIAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2023.2230060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2023.2230060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在后1619工程时代，一些传记历史学家被迫在他们的毕生研究中注入新的批判立场，往往将之前的见解或鲜为人知的背景剧本延伸到平庸的地步。在某些方面，简·安妮·摩尔和威廉·f·摩尔的《欧文·洛夫乔伊与平等联盟》既展示了在废奴主义的故事中肯定非裔美国人和女性的磐石，也展示了在批判种族理论中重复强调非人化和剥夺公民权的艰难处境。在他们的介绍中，作者谈到了这个令人不安的立场(11):

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Owen Lovejoy and the coalition for equality: clergy, African Americans, and women united for abolition

In a post-1619-Project climate, some biographical historians are compelled to pour new critical stances into their lifelong research, often stretching previous insights or little-known back scripts to the point of banality. In some respects, Jane Anne Moore and William F. Moore’s Owen Lovejoy and the Coalition for Equality demonstrates both the rock of affirming African Americans and women in the story of abolitionism and the hard place, where critical race theory redundantly highlights dehumanization and disenfranchisement. In their introduction, the authors address this uncomfortable position (11):

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

HISTORIAN HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.