2020-2021年柏卡-潘德朗地区医院住院伤寒患者使用头孢曲松和头孢克肟的成本效益分析

Yusransyah Yusransyah, Y. Rahmawati, Baha Udin, N. Kurnia
{"title":"2020-2021年柏卡-潘德朗地区医院住院伤寒患者使用头孢曲松和头孢克肟的成本效益分析","authors":"Yusransyah Yusransyah, Y. Rahmawati, Baha Udin, N. Kurnia","doi":"10.31603/pharmacy.v9i2.8648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typhoid fever is an infectious disease among humans caused by the bacterium Salmonella typhi. With the high Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) of Salmonella typhi, selecting the right antibiotic is a factor that must be considered in addition to cost constraints. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is needed. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of typhoid fever patients using ceftriaxone and cefixime antibiotics. The data used are retrospective, and the sampling was done by purposive sampling. This study was conducted at Berkah Pandeglang Regional Hospital. Sample in this study, namely typhoid fever patients of the period 2020-2021, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this study, 16 samples were obtained. The results of this study showed that the total average direct medical costs for the ceftriaxone group were IDR 78.632.500 In contrast, the cefixime group was IDR 75.527.300. The ACER value of typhoid fever patients who used Ceftriaxone + cefixime was IDR 91,646.27, Ceftriaxone was IDR 77,463.89, and cefixime was IDR 88,027.15. The patients with typhoid fever who used Ceftriaxone were more cost-effective than those who used Cefixime","PeriodicalId":17722,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Praktis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CEFTRIAXONE AND CEFIXIME IN TYPHOID FEVER PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED AT BERKAH PANDEGLANG REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021\",\"authors\":\"Yusransyah Yusransyah, Y. Rahmawati, Baha Udin, N. Kurnia\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/pharmacy.v9i2.8648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typhoid fever is an infectious disease among humans caused by the bacterium Salmonella typhi. With the high Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) of Salmonella typhi, selecting the right antibiotic is a factor that must be considered in addition to cost constraints. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is needed. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of typhoid fever patients using ceftriaxone and cefixime antibiotics. The data used are retrospective, and the sampling was done by purposive sampling. This study was conducted at Berkah Pandeglang Regional Hospital. Sample in this study, namely typhoid fever patients of the period 2020-2021, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this study, 16 samples were obtained. The results of this study showed that the total average direct medical costs for the ceftriaxone group were IDR 78.632.500 In contrast, the cefixime group was IDR 75.527.300. The ACER value of typhoid fever patients who used Ceftriaxone + cefixime was IDR 91,646.27, Ceftriaxone was IDR 77,463.89, and cefixime was IDR 88,027.15. The patients with typhoid fever who used Ceftriaxone were more cost-effective than those who used Cefixime\",\"PeriodicalId\":17722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Praktis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Praktis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/pharmacy.v9i2.8648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Praktis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/pharmacy.v9i2.8648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伤寒是一种由伤寒沙门氏菌引起的人类传染病。由于伤寒沙门氏菌具有较高的多药耐药性(MDR),除了成本限制外,选择合适的抗生素也是一个必须考虑的因素。因此,需要成本效益。本研究旨在确定伤寒患者使用头孢曲松和头孢克肟抗生素的成本效益。所使用的数据是回顾性的,抽样是通过有目的的抽样进行的。这项研究在Berkah Pandeglang地区医院进行。本研究中的样本,即2020-2021年期间符合纳入和排除标准的伤寒患者。在这项研究中,获得了16个样本。本研究结果显示,头孢曲松组的总平均直接医疗费用为78.632.500印尼盾。相反,头孢克肟组为75.527.300印尼盾。使用头孢曲松+头孢克肟的伤寒患者的ACER值为91646.27印尼盾,头孢曲松为77463.89印尼盾,而头孢克肟为88027.15印尼盾。使用头孢曲松的伤寒患者比使用头孢克肟的患者更具成本效益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CEFTRIAXONE AND CEFIXIME IN TYPHOID FEVER PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED AT BERKAH PANDEGLANG REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021
Typhoid fever is an infectious disease among humans caused by the bacterium Salmonella typhi. With the high Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) of Salmonella typhi, selecting the right antibiotic is a factor that must be considered in addition to cost constraints. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is needed. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of typhoid fever patients using ceftriaxone and cefixime antibiotics. The data used are retrospective, and the sampling was done by purposive sampling. This study was conducted at Berkah Pandeglang Regional Hospital. Sample in this study, namely typhoid fever patients of the period 2020-2021, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this study, 16 samples were obtained. The results of this study showed that the total average direct medical costs for the ceftriaxone group were IDR 78.632.500 In contrast, the cefixime group was IDR 75.527.300. The ACER value of typhoid fever patients who used Ceftriaxone + cefixime was IDR 91,646.27, Ceftriaxone was IDR 77,463.89, and cefixime was IDR 88,027.15. The patients with typhoid fever who used Ceftriaxone were more cost-effective than those who used Cefixime
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信