使用Protaper Gold、XP Endoshaper和Edgefile X7进行根管移动的锥形束计算机断层评估和根管对中评估

Q3 Dentistry
TusharKanti Majumdar, Minakshi Chowdhury, Sayantan Mukherjee, P. Mazumdar
{"title":"使用Protaper Gold、XP Endoshaper和Edgefile X7进行根管移动的锥形束计算机断层评估和根管对中评估","authors":"TusharKanti Majumdar, Minakshi Chowdhury, Sayantan Mukherjee, P. Mazumdar","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_146_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to access and evaluate canal transportation and canal centering ability of Protaper Gold (PTG), XP EndoShaper (XPS) and EdgeFile X7 using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted single-rooted premolars with mature apex and a canal curvature of 10°–20° were chosen and arbitrarily divided into three experimental groups (n = 20). After decoronation, the teeth measuring 16 mm were included in the study for standardization. According to the manufacturer's instructions, canals were shaped with PTG in Group 1, XPS in Group 2 and EdgeFile X7 in Group 3. For the evaluation of the root canal transportation at 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm from the apex, canals were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT scanner. Independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze data and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: XPS showed significantly lower canal transportation than PTG system. Moreover, the centering ability of the XPS significantly higher than EdgeFile X7 and PTG at all root levels (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The XPS and EdgeFile X7 rotary file system showed the lowest transportation in both mesiodistal and buccolingual directions and also the highest centering ability. The PTG file showed the highest transportation and lowest centering ability.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of canal centering using Protaper Gold, XP Endoshaper, and Edgefile X7\",\"authors\":\"TusharKanti Majumdar, Minakshi Chowdhury, Sayantan Mukherjee, P. Mazumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/endo.endo_146_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aims to access and evaluate canal transportation and canal centering ability of Protaper Gold (PTG), XP EndoShaper (XPS) and EdgeFile X7 using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted single-rooted premolars with mature apex and a canal curvature of 10°–20° were chosen and arbitrarily divided into three experimental groups (n = 20). After decoronation, the teeth measuring 16 mm were included in the study for standardization. According to the manufacturer's instructions, canals were shaped with PTG in Group 1, XPS in Group 2 and EdgeFile X7 in Group 3. For the evaluation of the root canal transportation at 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm from the apex, canals were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT scanner. Independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze data and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: XPS showed significantly lower canal transportation than PTG system. Moreover, the centering ability of the XPS significantly higher than EdgeFile X7 and PTG at all root levels (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The XPS and EdgeFile X7 rotary file system showed the lowest transportation in both mesiodistal and buccolingual directions and also the highest centering ability. The PTG file showed the highest transportation and lowest centering ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_146_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_146_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)观察和评价Protaper Gold (PTG)、XP EndoShaper (XPS)和EdgeFile X7的根管运输和根管定心能力。材料与方法:选择60颗刚拔除的根尖成熟、根管曲率为10°~ 20°的单根前磨牙,随机分为3个实验组(n = 20)。将装饰后的16 mm的牙齿纳入标准化研究。根据制造商的说明,1组用PTG, 2组用XPS, 3组用EdgeFile X7塑形管。为了评估根管在离根尖2 mm、4 mm和6 mm处的移动情况,我们使用CBCT扫描器械前后的根管。数据分析采用独立t检验和单因素方差分析,P < 0.05为显著性水平。结果:与PTG系统相比,XPS系统的运河运输明显减少。在各根水平上,XPS的定心能力显著高于EdgeFile X7和PTG (P < 0.05)。结论:XPS和EdgeFile X7旋转文件系统在中远端和颊舌方向上的移动最低,对中能力最高。PTG文件传输能力最强,居中能力最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of canal centering using Protaper Gold, XP Endoshaper, and Edgefile X7
Aim: This study aims to access and evaluate canal transportation and canal centering ability of Protaper Gold (PTG), XP EndoShaper (XPS) and EdgeFile X7 using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted single-rooted premolars with mature apex and a canal curvature of 10°–20° were chosen and arbitrarily divided into three experimental groups (n = 20). After decoronation, the teeth measuring 16 mm were included in the study for standardization. According to the manufacturer's instructions, canals were shaped with PTG in Group 1, XPS in Group 2 and EdgeFile X7 in Group 3. For the evaluation of the root canal transportation at 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm from the apex, canals were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT scanner. Independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze data and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: XPS showed significantly lower canal transportation than PTG system. Moreover, the centering ability of the XPS significantly higher than EdgeFile X7 and PTG at all root levels (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The XPS and EdgeFile X7 rotary file system showed the lowest transportation in both mesiodistal and buccolingual directions and also the highest centering ability. The PTG file showed the highest transportation and lowest centering ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信