检察官主导的审前分流的多点评估：对定罪、监禁和累犯的影响

Q1 Social Sciences

Criminal Justice Policy Review Pub Date : 2021-03-18 DOI:10.1177/08874034211000403

Robert C. Davis, Warren A. Reich, M. Rempel, M. Labriola

{"title":"检察官主导的审前分流的多点评估：对定罪、监禁和累犯的影响","authors":"Robert C. Davis, Warren A. Reich, M. Rempel, M. Labriola","doi":"10.1177/08874034211000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have witnessed a resurgence of interest in prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs, yet up-to-date research on the effectiveness of these programs is lacking. Participants in four prosecutor-led diversion programs, Cook County, IL (separate analyses for misdemeanor and felony participants), Milwaukee County, WI (two distinct programs varying in participant risk level and treatment intensity), and Chittenden County, VT, were propensity-score matched to comparison defendants (total n = 5,040). All programs yielded a significant decrease in instant case conviction (mean odds ratio = .12) and use of jail sentences (mean odds ratio = .33). There was also a trend toward reduced re-arrest at 2 years (mean odds ratio = .79). Three of four diversion programs significantly delayed onset of first re-arrest. Taken together, results support the effectiveness of a diverse set of prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs that varied in charge severity, participant risk level, and program duration and intensity.","PeriodicalId":10757,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Policy Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"890 - 909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08874034211000403","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multisite Evaluation of Prosecutor-Led Pretrial Diversion: Effects on Conviction, Incarceration, and Recidivism\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Davis, Warren A. Reich, M. Rempel, M. Labriola\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08874034211000403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have witnessed a resurgence of interest in prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs, yet up-to-date research on the effectiveness of these programs is lacking. Participants in four prosecutor-led diversion programs, Cook County, IL (separate analyses for misdemeanor and felony participants), Milwaukee County, WI (two distinct programs varying in participant risk level and treatment intensity), and Chittenden County, VT, were propensity-score matched to comparison defendants (total n = 5,040). All programs yielded a significant decrease in instant case conviction (mean odds ratio = .12) and use of jail sentences (mean odds ratio = .33). There was also a trend toward reduced re-arrest at 2 years (mean odds ratio = .79). Three of four diversion programs significantly delayed onset of first re-arrest. Taken together, results support the effectiveness of a diverse set of prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs that varied in charge severity, participant risk level, and program duration and intensity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"890 - 909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08874034211000403\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来，人们对检察官主导的审前分流计划的兴趣再次高涨，但缺乏对这些计划有效性的最新研究。四个检察官主导的分流项目的参与者，伊利诺伊州库克县（对轻罪和重罪参与者进行单独分析）、威斯康星州密尔沃基县（两个不同的项目，参与者风险水平和治疗强度不同）和佛蒙特州奇滕登县，倾向得分与对照被告相匹配（总n=5040）。所有项目都显著减少了即时案件定罪（平均比值比=0.12）和监禁判决的使用（平均比值比=0.33）。2年后再次逮捕也有减少的趋势（平均比值比值比=0.79）。四个分流项目中有三个显著推迟了首次再次逮捕的发生。总之，研究结果支持了一套由检察官主导的审前分流计划的有效性，这些计划在指控的严重程度、参与者的风险水平以及计划的持续时间和强度方面各不相同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Multisite Evaluation of Prosecutor-Led Pretrial Diversion: Effects on Conviction, Incarceration, and Recidivism

Recent years have witnessed a resurgence of interest in prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs, yet up-to-date research on the effectiveness of these programs is lacking. Participants in four prosecutor-led diversion programs, Cook County, IL (separate analyses for misdemeanor and felony participants), Milwaukee County, WI (two distinct programs varying in participant risk level and treatment intensity), and Chittenden County, VT, were propensity-score matched to comparison defendants (total n = 5,040). All programs yielded a significant decrease in instant case conviction (mean odds ratio = .12) and use of jail sentences (mean odds ratio = .33). There was also a trend toward reduced re-arrest at 2 years (mean odds ratio = .79). Three of four diversion programs significantly delayed onset of first re-arrest. Taken together, results support the effectiveness of a diverse set of prosecutor-led pretrial diversion programs that varied in charge severity, participant risk level, and program duration and intensity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Criminal Justice Policy Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Criminal Justice Policy Review (CJPR) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing articles written by scholars and professionals committed to the study of criminal justice policy through experimental and nonexperimental approaches. CJPR is published quarterly and accepts appropriate articles, essays, research notes, interviews, and book reviews. It also provides a forum for special features, which may include invited commentaries, transcripts of significant panels or meetings, position papers, and legislation. To maintain a leadership role in criminal justice policy literature, CJPR will publish articles employing diverse methodologies.